Using inverses to solve systems of equations

In summary, the use of ##I## in the equation ##X = IX## comes from the definition of the identity matrix in matrix multiplication, where the identity matrix multiplied by any matrix will result in the same matrix. It is analogous to the equation ##b = 1 \cdot b## for ordinary numbers.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1682305758972.png

Can someone please tell me where they got ##X = IX## from?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
From the definition of ##I##. It is the one in matrix multiplication.
$$
\begin{pmatrix}x_{11}&\ldots &x_{1n}\\ \vdots&&\vdots \\x_{n1}&\ldots &x_{nn}\end{pmatrix} \cdot \underbrace{\begin{pmatrix}1&0&\ldots&0&0\\ 0&1&\ldots&0&0 \\ \vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\vdots&\vdots \\
0&0&\ldots&0&1 \end{pmatrix}}_{=I}=\begin{pmatrix}x_{11}&\ldots &x_{1n}\\ \vdots&&\vdots \\x_{n1}&\ldots &x_{nn}\end{pmatrix}
$$

Then they used ##A^{-1} A= I## and the associativity law: ##(I\cdot X)=((A^{-1}A)X)=(A^{-1}(AX))=A^{-1}B.##
 
  • Like
Likes Grelbr42, YouAreAwesome, MatinSAR and 1 other person
  • #3
fresh_42 said:
From the definition of ##I##. It is the one in matrix multiplication.
$$
\begin{pmatrix}x_{11}&\ldots &x_{1n}\\ \vdots&&\vdots \\x_{n1}&\ldots &x_{nn}\end{pmatrix} \cdot \underbrace{\begin{pmatrix}1&0&\ldots&0&0\\ 0&1&\ldots&0&0 \\ \vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\vdots&\vdots \\
0&0&\ldots&0&1 \end{pmatrix}}_{=I}=\begin{pmatrix}x_{11}&\ldots &x_{1n}\\ \vdots&&\vdots \\x_{n1}&\ldots &x_{nn}\end{pmatrix}
$$

Then they used ##A^{-1} A= I## and the associativity law: ##(I\cdot X)=((A^{-1}A)X)=(A^{-1}(AX))=A^{-1}B.##
Thank you for your help @fresh_42! I see now.
 
  • Like
Likes YouAreAwesome
  • #4
ChiralSuperfields said:
Can someone please tell me where they got ##X = IX## from?
This should be obvious. Based on the initial post, X is a column vector. If X consists of n elements, multiplication of X by an n x n identity matrix ##I_n## produces exactly the same vector X. This is analogous to writing ##b = 1 \cdot b## for ordinary numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #5
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this,
View attachment 325404
Can someone please tell me where they got ##X = IX## from?

Many thanks!
The ##I## should trigger the phrase "##I##dentity Matrix". It was the reason ##I## was chosen rather than some other letter in the first place.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and member 731016

FAQ: Using inverses to solve systems of equations

What is an inverse matrix?

An inverse matrix is a matrix that, when multiplied by the original matrix, yields the identity matrix. For a matrix A, its inverse is denoted as A-1, and it satisfies the condition A * A-1 = I, where I is the identity matrix.

How do you find the inverse of a matrix?

To find the inverse of a matrix, you can use several methods including the Gauss-Jordan elimination, the adjugate method, or by using matrix decomposition techniques. For a 2x2 matrix, the inverse can be found using a straightforward formula involving the determinant and the adjugate of the matrix.

When can a matrix not have an inverse?

A matrix does not have an inverse if it is singular, meaning its determinant is zero. Such matrices are called non-invertible or singular matrices. In practical terms, this means the matrix does not have full rank and its rows or columns are linearly dependent.

How is the inverse of a matrix used to solve a system of equations?

To solve a system of linear equations represented in matrix form as AX = B, you can multiply both sides of the equation by the inverse of matrix A (if it exists) to isolate X. This results in X = A-1B, where X is the vector of unknowns, A is the coefficient matrix, and B is the vector of constants.

What are the limitations of using the inverse matrix method to solve systems of equations?

Using the inverse matrix method can be computationally expensive for large matrices, and it is not applicable if the matrix is singular or nearly singular (ill-conditioned). Additionally, numerical stability and precision issues can arise when dealing with floating-point arithmetic in practical computations.

Back
Top