Using the axioms of ordered field

In summary, the conversation discusses proving inequalities using the axioms of ordered plus and basic laws of equality. The first two parts prove $1 < 2$ and $0 < \frac{1}{2} < 1$, respectively. The third part uses the fact that $a < b$ implies $a < \frac{a+b}{2} < b$ to prove that if $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ and $a < b$, then $a < \frac{a+b}{2} < b$.
  • #1
NoName3
25
0
I only have the axioms of ordered plus the basic laws of equality and inequalities that follow from it.

1. Prove that $1 < 2$.

2. Prove that $0 < \frac{1}{2} < 1$

3. Prove that if $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ and $a < b$ then $a < \frac{a+b}{2} < b$

1. Assume the opposite - that's, suppose that $2 < 1$, then:

$\begin{aligned}
~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \begin{aligned} \\& ~~~~~2 <1 \\& \text {(Assumption)}
\\& \iff 2+(-1) < 1+(-1) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \\& \text {(Addition axiom)}
\\& \iff 2+(-1) < 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\\& \text{(Inverse law for addition)}
\\& \iff 2+(-1)+(-1) < - 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \\& \text{(Addition law for order)}

\\& \iff 2+(-2) < -1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\\& \text{(Associative law for addition)}

\\& \iff 0 < -1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \\& \text{(Inverse law for addition)}

\\& \iff 0 < (-1) (-1) \\& \text{(Multiplication law of order)}

\\& \iff 0 < 1 \\& \text{(Inverse law for multiplication)}

\\& \iff 0 < (1)+(1) < 2 \\& \text{(Addition law for order)}

\\& \iff 1 < 2 \\& \text{(Contradiction to assumption)}.\end{aligned} \end{aligned} $

1. I realized that I could simply said since we have the rule $-1 < 0 < 1.$ We have $0 < 1 \iff 1 < (1)+(1) \iff 1 < 2$.

2. From part (1) we have $1 < 2 \iff 2^{-1} < 1 \iff \frac{1}{2} < 1$. Also we have since $0 < 1$ and $1 < 2$ then $0 < 2 \iff 0 < \frac{1}{2}$.

Putting this together we get $0 < \frac{1}{2} < 1$. However, I still can't prove part (3).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For 3, can you start with $a=\dfrac{a+a}{2}<\dfrac{a+b}{2}$?
 
  • #3
greg1313 said:
For 3, can you start with $a=\dfrac{a+a}{2}<\dfrac{a+b}{2}$?

So $a=\dfrac{a+a}{2}<\dfrac{a+b}{2} < \dfrac{b+b}{2} = b.$ Thus $a < \dfrac{a+b}{2} < b$.

Brilliant! Thank you!
 

FAQ: Using the axioms of ordered field

What are the axioms of an ordered field?

The axioms of an ordered field are a set of rules that define the properties of an ordered field. These axioms include the commutative, associative, and distributive properties for addition and multiplication, as well as the existence of an additive identity and multiplicative identity. The axioms also include the existence of additive and multiplicative inverses for all non-zero elements, and the trichotomy property which states that any two elements in the field can be compared and are either equal, or one is greater than the other.

How are the axioms of an ordered field used in scientific research?

The axioms of an ordered field are used in scientific research to define and study mathematical models and systems that exhibit properties of an ordered field. For example, in physics, the real numbers are often used as an ordered field to describe the properties of quantities such as time, distance, and velocity. The axioms of an ordered field are also used in economic and financial models to describe the properties of quantities such as money and interest.

Can the axioms of an ordered field be modified or changed?

The axioms of an ordered field are a fundamental part of the field and cannot be modified or changed. Any modification or alteration of the axioms would result in a different mathematical structure that would no longer exhibit the properties of an ordered field. However, there are variations of the axioms, such as the axioms of a partially ordered field, which may have slightly different properties and rules.

What are the consequences of violating the axioms of an ordered field?

If the axioms of an ordered field are violated, the resulting structure would no longer be considered an ordered field. This could lead to contradictions and inconsistencies in mathematical operations and properties. For example, the commutative property of addition would not hold if the axioms are violated, and this could lead to incorrect results and conclusions in scientific research.

Are the axioms of an ordered field universally accepted?

Yes, the axioms of an ordered field are universally accepted by mathematicians and scientists as they are essential for defining and studying mathematical structures with properties of an ordered field. These axioms have been extensively studied and tested, and they have been found to be consistent and reliable in a wide range of mathematical applications and research areas.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
791
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top