Atomic Van der Waal repulsion and Lennard Jones potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical derivation of the Lennard-Jones potential, specifically the formula V = ε[(δ/r)^{12} - 2(δ/r)^{6}]. J.E. Lennard-Jones's article "Cohesion" from the Proceedings of the Physical Society is mentioned as a primary source, along with various academic lectures and notes. The contributors clarify that the 1/r^{12} term is a numerical convenience, while the 1/r^{6} term arises from perturbative treatment of dipole-dipole interactions. Additional references include "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran and a comprehensive QM textbook by Cohen-Tannoudji et al. These resources provide detailed insights into the derivation and implications of the Lennard-Jones potential.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Hello there. Do you know any paper that derive the Lennard Jones potential ##V = \epsilon [(\delta / r)^{12}-2(\delta / r)^6]## theorically? If you know a book instead, let me know. Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently, J E Lennard-Jones discusses some details in an article entitled, Cohesion, in the Proceedings of the Physical Society (1926-1948)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0959-5309/43/5/301 (must be purchased or accessed through one institution)

Otherwise, one can find notes in various university or academic lectures.
https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshe...Specific_Interactions/Lennard-Jones_Potential

https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshe...cific_Interactions/Dipole-Dipole_Interactions

The Wikipedia article seems consistent with some academic notes I reviewed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennard-Jones_potential#Physical_background_and_mathematical_details
 
The ##\frac{1}{r^{12}}## portion is not physical--it's just a numerically convenient way to approximate a rapidly increasing function. It's a vestige from a time when computers were much much slower.

The ##\frac{1}{r^6}## portion comes from treating the dipole-dipole interaction perturbatively to second order. This is actually the short-distance limit of the full interaction, not taking into account retardation effects. The full derivation in all its gory details of both short (London) and long (Casimir-Polder) limits is given in "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran (p. 152ff): https://www.google.com/books/editio...rpbdozIZt3sC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astronuc, vanhees71, Demystifier and 1 other person
TeethWhitener said:
The ##\frac{1}{r^6}## portion comes from treating the dipole-dipole interaction perturbatively to second order. This is actually the short-distance limit of the full interaction, not taking into account retardation effects. The full derivation in all its gory details of both short (London) and long (Casimir-Polder) limits is given in "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran (p. 152ff): https://www.google.com/books/editio...rpbdozIZt3sC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
A derivation can also be found in the 3-volume QM textbook by Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu and Laloe, Chapter XI.C.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and TeethWhitener
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
Back
Top