Undergrad Van der Waals attractive force: Why don't the imbalances average out?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the transient shift in electron density that leads to Van der Waals forces, which occur at distances of 0.4 to 0.6 nanometers between atoms. This shift creates a temporary charge that can attract or repel nearby atoms. The average interactions are considered through the sum of various strengths based on angles and distances. When two close spheres experience polarization, the induced charges lead to an attraction between them. The concept of induction is highlighted as a key factor in understanding these interactions.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,762
Reaction score
248
TL;DR
When a van der Waals force between two objects is attractive (before getting too close), it is due to the variable distribution of electrical charge between the molecules. But why wouldn't this variation average out (+ + /+ -/- +/- -) to give zero?
The summary refers, for example, to the Wikipedia explanation
"The force results from a transient shift in electron density. Specifically, the electron density may temporarily shift more greatly to one side of the nucleus. This generates a transient charge to which a nearby atom can be either attracted or repelled."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_der_Waals_force

(for a distance between atoms of between 0.4 to 0.6 nanometers, as explained in that article)

Also, when I speak of the average (+ + /+ -/- +/- -) , this would include the sum (integral) of all the different strengths according to the angles, distances, etc. But the idea is still the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider two close spheres, (±) (±). One becomes momentarily polarised, +()– (±). The other sphere then takes an induced polarisation in the same direction, +()– +()–. The closest points on the spheres have opposite charge so attraction dominates.
 
Thank you, Baluncore. I had not considered induction. Question answered! :smile:
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
65K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K