MHB Vanessa 's question at Yahoo Answers ( R^2-{(0,0)} homeomorphic to S^1 x R )

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the question of whether ℝ² - {(0,0)} is homeomorphic to S¹ x ℝ. It explains that ℝ² - {(0,0)} can be represented as a disjoint union of circles, which leads to the conclusion that it is homeomorphic to S¹ x (0,+∞). Additionally, since (0,+∞) is homeomorphic to ℝ, this establishes the desired homeomorphism. The response encourages further questions to be posted on a dedicated math help forum. The explanation effectively clarifies the relationship between the two topological spaces.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Vanessa,

We can express $\mathbb R^2 \setminus \{(0,0)\}$ as disjoint union of circles: $$\mathbb R^2 \setminus \{(0,0)\}=\displaystyle\bigcup_{r\in (0,+\infty)}C_r\;,\qquad C_r=\{(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^2:x^2+y^2=r^2\}$$ This is equivalent to say that $\mathbb R^2 \setminus \{(0,0)\}$ is homeomorphic to $S^1 \times (0,+\infty)$. Now, use that $(0,+\infty)$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$.

If you have further questions, you can post them in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f13/ section.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top