- #1
Angelos K
- 48
- 0
I'm reading a proof that is via variation. [tex] \vec {\delta A} [/tex] stands for a variation of the vectorpotential [tex] \vec{A} [/tex]. If I understand the argument correctly [many steps are presented as one] it means:
[tex] (\nabla \times \vec{A})* (\nabla \times \vec{\delta A}) = (\nabla \times \nabla \times \vec {A})*\vec{\delta A} [/tex].
I do not believe it. If I calculate the brackets on the left hand side individually I don't get any undifferentiated [tex] \vec{\delta A} [/tex]. What am I doing wrong?
You can find the "whole" calculation on page 10 of the attached file.
[tex] (\nabla \times \vec{A})* (\nabla \times \vec{\delta A}) = (\nabla \times \nabla \times \vec {A})*\vec{\delta A} [/tex].
I do not believe it. If I calculate the brackets on the left hand side individually I don't get any undifferentiated [tex] \vec{\delta A} [/tex]. What am I doing wrong?
You can find the "whole" calculation on page 10 of the attached file.
Attachments
Last edited: