Vector Proof Question for position of particle

In summary, the homework statement is "If ~r, ~v and ~a denote the position, velocity and acceleration of a particle, prove that (d/dt)[ a * ( v x r)] = (da/dt) * (v x r)."
  • #1
Momentous
18
0

Homework Statement



If ~r, ~v and ~a denote the position, velocity and acceleration of a particle, prove that

Homework Equations



(d/dt)[ a * ( v x r)] = (da/dt) * (v x r)

"*" is a dot product
"x" is a cross product

The Attempt at a Solution



I didn't really get that far. The only thing I could think of was to make v = dr/dt, and a = d^2r, dt^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What are the properties of the cross product that you know about?
 
  • #3
If ~r, ~v and ~a denote the position, velocity and acceleration of a particle, prove that
(d/dt)[ a * ( v x r)] = (da/dt) * (v x r)

OK - let me just tidy that up a bit:

##\vec{r}##, ##\vec{v}##, ##\vec{a}##, are the vectors ... the relation to prove is:$$\frac{d}{dt}\left [ \vec{a}\cdot(\vec{v}\times\vec{r}) \right ]=\frac{d\vec{a}}{dt}\cdot(\vec{v}\times\vec{r})$$... you correctly realize that $$\vec{v}=\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\; \text{&}\; \vec{a}=\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}$$ will probably be important.

You will also need to review the rules for dot and cross products (how do they combine?) and you have to figure out how the product rule works with them.
These should be in your notes. If you have trouble locating them there, you'll find them online - just google for dot and cross products.
 
  • #4
Welcome to PF!

Hi Momentous! Welcome to PF! :smile:

You don't seem to be aware that the product rule applies …

(a.bxc)' = a'.bxc + a.b'xc + a.bxc' :wink:​
 
  • #5
Thank you guys for the welcoming! I really appreciate the help. My knowledge of vectors is definitely lacking. I totally missed the product rule there.

So by following that, it seems like I would get

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r) + a.(a x r) + a.(v x v)

with v x v = 0, I would have

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r) + a.(a x r)

That seems a little bit closer, but I know I'm still off. Would rewriting the last piece as a.(dv/dt x r) help out there? I'm wondering if that would be some type of vector identity.
 
  • #6
If u,v, and w are all vectors, expand u.(vxw)
hint: compare what you have with what you need - what must be true in order to get there?
 
  • #7
I don't know how to expand that. It's been 2 years since I've taken calc 3, and I haven't really used it since.
 
  • #8
so do the comparison...

(if only there were some easily searchable database of information at our fingertips where stuff like the properties of cross and dot products could be looked up...)
 
  • #9
Alright, so with the information you guys have given me, I think this is the closest I can get.

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r) + a.(a x r) + a.(v x v) by product rule

Rewritten

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r) + a.(a x r)

Rewrite as

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r) + r.(a x a)

from the link that Simon Bridge gave me

Rewrite as

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r)

And that's it? I think.
Thanks for the help. I was really lost
 
  • #10
...
(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r)
Which is the relation you needed. Well done.
It was just a matter of knowing a bit of algebra.

You should probably brush up on these operations.
 
  • #11
Momentous said:
Alright, so with the information you guys have given me, I think this is the closest I can get.

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r) + a.(a x r) + a.(v x v) by product rule

Rewritten

(a.(v x r))' = a'.(v x r) + a.(a x r)
You could also get to the result you needed by applying some basic information you should know about cross and dot products. In particular, what do you know about the direction of ##\vec{a}## compared to that of ##\vec{a}\times\vec{r}##?
 
  • #12
I don't want to sound like I'm making excuses, but my Vector Calc skills are minimal at best. Most of my physics classes haven't made much use of applying calculus. We usually don't go into it that much. I know these are things that I should know, but most of it I don't.

Vela, I imagine that you are getting at the fact that a is orthogonal to a x r. That would make a . (a x r) the dot product of two orthogonal vectors, which would be zero. Now that you point that out, it's easy to see that I don't need to switch around anything with a triple product. But still, these are things I'm not going to see until the courses I'm in right now really use Vector Calc on a regular basis.Again, thank you guys so much for the help. I plan on using these forums a lot when I need the assistance. You guys are all genius's.
 
  • #13
Ahhh - we've just been doing this long enough to make all those mistakes already ;)
 
  • #14
(just got up :zzz:)

another formula you need to learn …

a.(bxc) = c.(axb) = b.(cxa) :smile:​

(and they're all the volume of a parallepiped, ie a squashed box, of sides with vectors a b and c)
 

FAQ: Vector Proof Question for position of particle

What is a vector proof question for the position of a particle?

A vector proof question for the position of a particle is a mathematical problem that requires the use of vectors to determine the position of a particle in space at a specific time. It involves using vector operations such as addition, subtraction, and scalar multiplication to solve for the position vector of the particle.

2. How do you approach a vector proof question for the position of a particle?

The first step in approaching a vector proof question for the position of a particle is to draw a diagram representing the given information. Then, identify the known and unknown variables, and define their respective position vectors. Next, use vector operations and equations to solve for the unknown position vector of the particle.

3. What are some common vector proofs used for solving particle position questions?

Some common vector proofs used for solving particle position questions include the Pythagorean theorem, the law of cosines, and the dot product. These proofs allow for the calculation of magnitudes and angles between vectors, which are essential in determining the position of a particle in space.

4. Can a vector proof question for the position of a particle involve more than two dimensions?

Yes, a vector proof question for the position of a particle can involve more than two dimensions. In fact, most real-world applications involve three-dimensional space, where vectors have three components (x, y, and z). The principles and techniques used in solving two-dimensional vector proofs can be extended to higher dimensions.

5. What are some practical applications of vector proof questions for particle position?

Vector proof questions for particle position have numerous practical applications in fields such as physics, engineering, and navigation. For example, they can be used to calculate the trajectory of a projectile, the displacement of a moving object, or the position of a satellite in orbit. They are also used in computer graphics to model the movement of objects in three-dimensional space.

Similar threads

Conservation of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector in a Central Field
Replies
3
Views
2K
Find the values of A, B, and C such that the action is a minimum
Replies
3
Views
2K
Equation of motion in curved spacetime
Replies
1
Views
1K
Deriving Cross Vectors: Understanding d/dt[a * (v x r)] = a (v x r)
Replies
16
Views
2K
Physical Interpretation of a Vector Quantity
Replies
4
Views
2K
Cylindrical Coordinates: Line Integral Of Electrostatic Field
Replies
4
Views
3K
How is the Coriolis generalized potential obtained
Replies
1
Views
2K
Path of a deflected charge? Solvable ODE's?
Replies
15
Views
2K
How to Derive Radial Geodesics in Kerr Metric?
Replies
11
Views
3K
MHB Proving Equation (1): Let r(t) be a Vector in $\mathbb{R^3}$
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top