- #1
debjit625
- 40
- 0
Hi all got a confusion
In many books I saw , authors used a specific statement here is it
a,b,c are vectors and axb is (" a cross b")
In general
(axb)xc ≠ ax(bxc)
but if
(axb)xc = ax(bxc)
solving it we get
bx(axc)=0
then it implies
either b is parallel to (axc)
or a and c are collinear.
Now my question is can I say a and c are parallel rather co linear ,my confusion arise as all books I referred they all say its co linear.
Now I think in general a and c doesn't have to lie in a same line to get the specific definition of co linearity ,
but I am not sure.
Thanks
In many books I saw , authors used a specific statement here is it
a,b,c are vectors and axb is (" a cross b")
In general
(axb)xc ≠ ax(bxc)
but if
(axb)xc = ax(bxc)
solving it we get
bx(axc)=0
then it implies
either b is parallel to (axc)
or a and c are collinear.
Now my question is can I say a and c are parallel rather co linear ,my confusion arise as all books I referred they all say its co linear.
Now I think in general a and c doesn't have to lie in a same line to get the specific definition of co linearity ,
but I am not sure.
Thanks