Vectors - Aircraft's velocity relative to ground

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding aircraft velocity in relation to ground speed and airspeed, specifically addressing confusion over vector calculations. The original poster miscalculated the resultant velocity, believing it should be larger than the airspeed due to wind conditions. They seek clarification on the correct approach to drawing vector diagrams and calculating the resultant. Respondents suggest using either the "nose to tail" method or the parallelogram method for accurate vector representation. Properly adjusting the vector lengths in the diagram is crucial for achieving correct results.
g9WfI
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
An aircraft is scheduled to fly from London to Belfast, a distance of 510 km in a direction N 40 W. The aircraft has a cruising speed of 240 m/s in still air. On the day of the flight, there is a wind of velocity 15 m/s towards the east. Find the direction in which the aircraft must fly to reach Belfast without any change of course, and the magnitude of the velocity of the aircraft relative to the ground.
Relevant Equations
relative velocities, cosine rule, sine rule
I attach my working below - my angle is correct according to mark scheme but magnitude isn't (should be 230).
I think it's odd that my resultant velocity on a windy day is larger than velocity in still air, but apparently my angle is correct?
IMG_E7C62EC2B47D-1.jpeg

I've been told that I've calculated the airspeed it would need if it were to maintain a ground speed of 240 m/s... And the question asked for the ground speed given that the airspeed is 240.

I don't fully understand the above statement. Is the highlighted equation in my working correct? How do I change my vector diagram? At the moment, I can't see any other way to use the information given.

It appears I just don't know how to do this q - I haven't seen an example like this before. I'd be so grateful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagrams are wrong.
You have two vectors emanating from the same point, then draw the resultant as connecting their endpoints.
Instead, you can use either of the following:
1. Nose to tail: Draw one vector from point O to point A, and the second vector from A to B. The resultant is then OB.
2. Complete the parallelogram: Draw one vector from O to A and the second from O to B. Now draw AC and BC so that OACB is a parallelogram. The resultant is OC.

It will help if you draw the magnitude 240 vector longer than the magnitude 15 vector!
 
4EEE22A4-C073-4EAD-A3AA-4E07092CA4D8.jpeg
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top