Velocity of spheres after collision

In summary, the problem involves three spheres on a frictionless surface, with two attached by a cord and the third colliding with one of them. The goal is to determine the velocity of each sphere immediately after the impact, given the tautness of the cord and perfectly elastic impact between the two spheres. The solution involves using equations for conservation of linear momentum and conservation of energy, and then substituting in the known information to solve for the unknown velocities. However, the algebraic equations involved can be complex and may require careful simplification to arrive at a solution.
  • #1
Saitama
4,243
93

Homework Statement


Three spheres, each of mass m, can slide freely on a frictionless, horizontal surface. Spheres A and B are attached to an inextensible inelastic cord of length / and are at rest in the position shown when sphere B is struck directly by sphere C which is moving to the right with a velocity ##v_o##. Knowing that the cord is taut when sphere B is struck by sphere C and assuming perfectly elastic impact between B and C, determine the velocity of each sphere immediately after impact.
attachment.php?attachmentid=58700&stc=1&d=1368454112.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let the velocity of A, B and C after collision be ##v_A##, ##v_B## and ##v_C## respectively.

Conserving linear momentum,
##mv_0=mv_A+mv_B+mv_C##

As the string is inextensible, the components of velocity of A and B along the string should be equal i.e ##v_A\sin\theta=v_B\sin\theta \Rightarrow v_A=v_B## but this is wrong because as per the answer key the velocities of A and B are different.
 

Attachments

  • spheres.png
    spheres.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 1,148
  • after collision.png
    after collision.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 714
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hmm interesting question I think that the problem lies in the directions you have decided for the velocities of A and B. How can the velocity of A have a component perpendicular to the string if the tension can only provide impulse to it? Also for B the tension will give an impulse and the velocity vector won't be parallel to Vo. You have to use vector equations for conservation of linear momentum.
 
  • #3
Pranav-Arora said:
As the string is inextensible, the components of velocity of A and B along the string should be equal
It's a string, not a rod.
 
  • #4
Let the velocity of B in horizontal and vertical direction be ##v_{Bx}## and ##v_{By}## and similarly for A, ##v_{Ax}## and ##v_{Ay}##

Conserving momentum in the horizontal direction,
##mv_o=mv_{Ax}+mv_{Bx}+mv_C##

Conserving momentum in the vertical direction,
##0=mv_{Ay}+mv_{By} \Rightarrow v_{By}=-v_{Ay}##

I still need more equations to solve the problem. I can only think of conserving energy.
[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv_o^2=\frac{1}{2}mv_C^2+\frac{1}{2}m(v_{Ax}^2+v_{Ay}^2)+ \frac {1}{2}m(v_{Bx}^2+v_{By}^2)[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow v_o^2=v_C^2+v_{Ax}^2+2v_{Ay}^2+v_{Bx}^2[/tex]

Is it right to assume that C moves only in horizontal direction even after the collision?
As the collision is elastic, ##v_o=v_{Bx}-v_{C}##.

Am I doing this right? I still need more equations.
 
  • #5
One equation is to equate the velocities along the string. As it is an elastic collision don't use conservation of energy just use coefficient of restitution as energy conservation gives complicated equations and the same result as coefficient of restitution.

EDIT:

And yes C will move in horizontal direction only as no vertical impulse acts on it. We have 5 unknowns and 5 equations but I don't think we will get the answer as conserving energy isn't a "unique equation" and using coefficient of restitution is the same thing.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
consciousness said:
One equation is to equate the velocities along the string.

I think I cannot do that. Check haruspex's post.
 
  • #7
Pranav-Arora said:
I think I cannot do that. Check haruspex's post.

Well I thought that since the string remains tight after the collision the components along it would be equal. As for how it remains tight I don't have any mathematical reason but I cannot imagine practically how the the string would become loose after the collision.
 
  • #8
consciousness said:
Well I thought that since the string remains tight after the collision the components along it would be equal. As for how it remains tight I don't have any mathematical reason but I cannot imagine practically how the the string would become loose after the collision.
Ive come around to your view. Initially, at least, it will remain taut. And since it is taut before the collision, you can treat the collision as work conserving.
##v_o=v_{Bx}-v_{C}##
No, that ignores the role of A. Consider KE of whole system.
 
  • #9
haruspex said:
No, that ignores the role of A. Consider KE of whole system.

Does this mean I can conserve energy in this problem?

And can I equate the components of velocity of A and B along the string?
 
  • #10
Pranav-Arora said:
Does this mean I can conserve energy in this problem?

And can I equate the components of velocity of A and B along the string?

Yes, I think you can justify both of those.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Yes, I think you can justify both of those.

I wrote the equation for conservation of energy in post #4.

(I have assumed that x component of velocity both A and B is in the right direction and y-component in vertically upward direction)
Equating the components of velocity along the string,
[tex]v_{By}\cos \theta+v_{Bx}\sin \theta=v_{Ax}\sin \theta+v_{Ay}\cos \theta[/tex]
[tex](v_{Bx}-v_{Ax})\sin \theta=2v_{Ay}\cos \theta[/tex]

From the figure, ##\sin \theta=1/2## and ##\cos \theta=\sqrt{3}/{2}##
[tex]\Rightarrow v_{Bx}-v_{Ax}=2\sqrt{3}v_{Ay}[/tex]

That's going to be really dirty.

Can you give me a few ideas how should I begin to solve this? I have got enough equations I think but substituting expressions in the energy equation gives so many squared terms. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Pranav-Arora said:
I have got enough equations I think but substituting expressions in the energy equation gives so many squared terms. :rolleyes:
When you substitute in the energy equation, you should find a common factor (a velocity) that cancels out, reducing it to a linear form.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
When you substitute in the energy equation, you should find a common factor (a velocity) that cancels out, reducing it to a linear form.

I had ##v_o=v_{Ax}+v_{Bx}+v_C \Rightarrow v_C=v_o-(v_{Ax}+v_{Bx})##
Also ##v_{Bx}-v_{Ax}/2\sqrt{3}=v_{Ay}##

Substituting them in the energy equation,
[tex]v_o^2=v_o^2+v_{Ax}^2+v_{Bx}^2-2v_o(v_{Ax}+v_{Bx})+\frac{v_{Bx}^2+v_{Ax}^2-2v_{Ax}v_{Bx}}{6}+v_{Bx}^2[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow 12v_o(v_{Ax}+v_{Bx})=7v_{Ax}^2+19v_{Bx}^2-2v_{Ax}v_{Bx}[/tex]
I don't see how can I simplify that. :confused:
 
  • #14
One equation is still missing: conservation of angular momentum.

ehild
 
  • #15
ehild said:
One equation is still missing: conservation of angular momentum.

ehild

About what point should I do this? :confused:

About A?
 
  • #16
I would do it around the point above C, in the horizontal line between A and B. But A is good, too.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
ehild said:
I would do it around the point above C, in the horizontal line between A and B.

I am assuming the point X shown in attachment.
attachment.php?attachmentid=58713&stc=1&d=1368523091.png

About that point,
[tex]0=\frac{mv_{By}\ell}{2}+\frac{mv_{Ax}\sqrt{3}\ell}{2}[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow v_{By}=-\sqrt{3}v_{Ax}[/tex]

Correct?
 

Attachments

  • X.png
    X.png
    8.8 KB · Views: 986
Last edited:
  • #18
correct
 
  • #19
ehild said:
correct

I further solved it but I am not able to reach the right answer.

I had ##v_{Bx}-v_{Ax}x=2\sqrt{3}v_{Ay}##. As ##v_{By}=-\sqrt{3}v_{Ax}=-v_{Ay}##

[tex]v_{Bx}-v_{Ax}=6v_{Ax} \Rightarrow v_{Bx}=7v_{Ax}[/tex]

From the energy equation:
[tex]12v_o(v_{Ax}+v_{Bx})=7v_{Ax}^2+13v_{Bx}^2-2v_{Ax}v_{Bx}[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow 12v_o(8v_{Ax})=(7+13\times 49-14)v_{Ax}^2[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow v_{Ax}=\frac{16v_o}{105}[/tex]

[tex]v_A=\sqrt{v_{Ax}^2+v_{Ay}^2}=2v_{Ax}=\frac{32v_o}{105}[/tex]

But this is wrong. :confused:
 
  • #20
You might have an error in the energy equation. Check.

ehild
 
  • #21
ehild said:
You might have an error in the energy equation. Check.

ehild

I did find a mistake in the energy equation [strike]but I still do not end up with the right answer[/strike] .

I will make the equations again.
I had ##v_C=v_o-(v_{Ax}+v_{Bx})=v_o-8v_{Ax}##
##\Rightarrow v_C^2=v_o^2+64v_{Ax}^2-16v_ov_{Ax}##

From the energy equation,
[tex]v_o^2=v_C^2+v_{Ax}^2+2v_{Ay}^2+v_{Bx}^2[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow v_o^2=v_o^2+64v_{Ax}^2-16v_ov_{Ax}+v_{Ax}^2+2(\sqrt{3}v_{Ax})^2+49v_{Ax}^2[/tex]

Solving this, I get ##v_{Ax}=2v_o/15## and therefore ##v_{A}=2v_{Ax}=4v_o/15## which is correct as per the answer key.

[tex]v_C=v_o-8v_{Ax}=v_o-\frac{16}{15}v_o=\frac{-v_o}{15}[/tex]

I have ##v_{Bx}=7v_{Ax}=14v_o/15## and ##v_{By}=-\sqrt{3}v_{Ax}=-2\sqrt{3}v_o/15##
Hence,
[tex]v_B=\sqrt{v_{Bx}^2+v_{By}^2}=\frac{v_o}{15}\sqrt{196+12}=\frac{\sqrt{208}v_o}{15}[/tex]

Thank you ehild and haruspex! :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Arnav jamale
  • #22
What should I do if collision was head on inelastic
 
  • #23
Reply fast
 
  • #24
Arnav jamale said:
What should I do if collision was inelastic
I assume you mean completely inelastic. What can you think of? What equation would you have instead?
 
  • #25
Conservation of linear momentum but we can't conserve kinetic energy
 
  • #26
So I just want is it possible to determine velocity of sphere B
 
  • #27
Arnav jamale said:
Conservation of linear momentum but we can't conserve kinetic energy
Yes, but there is another equation available. If two bodies collide, head-on, completely inelastically, what do you know about their subsequent velocities?
 
  • #28
Do you mean one dimension equation which tell us final velocities after collision which also contains coefficient of restitution
 
  • #29
But this oblique collision and we don't have coefficient of restitution
 
  • #30
Arnav jamale said:
But this oblique collision and we don't have coefficient of restitution
The set up in post #1 is not oblique. Maybe your problem is different.
Completely inelastic means the coefficient is zero.
 
  • #31
My setup is same but it's not perfectly inelastic it's just head on inelastic
 
  • #32
Arnav jamale said:
it's just head on inelastic
I do not know what you mean by that. Is it a head on collision or oblique?
 

FAQ: Velocity of spheres after collision

What is the definition of velocity in the context of a collision?

Velocity is a measure of an object's speed and direction. In the context of a collision, it refers to the speed and direction of a sphere before and after the collision.

How is the velocity of spheres calculated after a collision?

The velocity of spheres after a collision is calculated using the principles of conservation of momentum and conservation of kinetic energy. The mass, initial velocity, and direction of each sphere are taken into account to determine the final velocities.

Is the velocity of spheres after a collision always the same as before the collision?

No, the velocity of spheres after a collision can be different from the initial velocity before the collision. This is due to the transfer of energy and momentum during the collision.

Can the velocity of spheres after a collision be negative?

Yes, the velocity of spheres after a collision can be negative. This indicates that the sphere is moving in the opposite direction compared to its initial velocity before the collision.

How does the elasticity of the spheres affect their velocity after a collision?

The elasticity of the spheres determines how much kinetic energy is conserved during the collision. If the spheres have high elasticity, more kinetic energy will be conserved, resulting in higher velocities after the collision. If the spheres have low elasticity, less kinetic energy will be conserved, resulting in lower velocities after the collision.

Back
Top