- #1
arivero
Gold Member
- 3,458
- 153
Just noticed that http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0110060 has an antecedent in http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?j=EULEE,2,199
It is a deep meditation. If one takes C and l (The Planck length, not the Planck mass) as fundamentals, then one can to build an angular momentum, mass.velocity*distance by introducing a mass. For instance the mass of the electron. Still, I have problems to see how does gravity -and Newton constant- work here. It seems that in a=G m /r^2 the G is born because of the m, and Veneziano seems to claim that both are unnecessary.
Please read both papers, or the shortest one :-) and give your opinion.
ah, it is free until december
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0295-5075/2/3/006
It is a deep meditation. If one takes C and l (The Planck length, not the Planck mass) as fundamentals, then one can to build an angular momentum, mass.velocity*distance by introducing a mass. For instance the mass of the electron. Still, I have problems to see how does gravity -and Newton constant- work here. It seems that in a=G m /r^2 the G is born because of the m, and Veneziano seems to claim that both are unnecessary.
Please read both papers, or the shortest one :-) and give your opinion.
ah, it is free until december
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0295-5075/2/3/006
Last edited by a moderator: