Verifying Equation for Particle Energy (E): p=γpmv

  • Thread starter Thread starter seto6
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the equation for particle energy, specifically the relationship between momentum (p), relativistic factors (γ), and energy (E). It clarifies that the expression for kinetic energy (KE) should not use the Newtonian approximation (mv²/2) but rather the relativistic formula, leading to KE = mc²(γ - 1). The equation E² - (pc)² = E₀ is confirmed, with emphasis on using p = γmv for accurate calculations. The participants agree on the importance of incorporating higher-order terms when v approaches c, as they significantly impact the total energy. Overall, the thread seeks to ensure correct application of relativistic equations in particle physics.
seto6
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
so we have total energy of particle ->E

p=γp=1/(1-(v/c)2)-1/2

1)E=γpmc2=E0+K=Rest energy+ kinetic energy
=mc2+mv2/2
the second line correct?

2) E2-(pc)2=E0
so P= mv or p=γpmv

im sure that we are suppose to use p=γpmv but not sure some one verify pls
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't quite understand 2).

However for 1), if you expand p in a power series in (v/c)2, the first two terms are what you are showing. The higher order terms matter when v/c -> 1.
 
seto6 said:
so we have total energy of particle ->E

p=γp=1/(1-(v/c)2)-1/2

1)E=γpmc2=E0+K=Rest energy+ kinetic energy
=mc2+mv2/2
the second line correct?

Nope, the second line is not correct. mv2 is the Newtonian expression for kinetic energy (KE).
You can obtain the correct relativistic expression for KE from:

γ=(1-(v/c)2)-1/2

E=γmc2=E0+KE = Rest energy+ kinetic energy

KE = E-E0 = γmc2-mc2 = mc2(γ-1)

seto6 said:
2) E2-(pc)2=E0
so P= mv or p=γpmv

im sure that we are suppose to use p=γpmv so but not sure some one verify pls
You should be using p = γmv = mv(1-(v/c)2)-1/2 so that

E2-(pc)2=E02

E2=E02+(pc)2

E2=(mc2)2+(γmvc) 2
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
842
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K