Verifying Solutions of de Broglie Form of Schr. Eqn

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    De broglie Form
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying whether the wave functions ψ_1 and ψ_2 satisfy the de Broglie form of the Schrödinger equation. The first wave function leads to a differential equation that does not equal the expected form, while the second wave function also produces a similar discrepancy. Participants confirm that the differentiation of both wave functions was performed correctly, but the issue lies in demonstrating that neither function satisfies the equation due to their failure to yield the de Broglie relation. Ultimately, the conversation highlights confusion over the interpretation of the results, as both wave functions appear to align with the de Broglie relation upon simplification. The conclusion emphasizes the need for clarity in the relationship between the wave functions and the expected physical principles.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
I am to show that neither of the two wave functions \psi_1 (x,t) = M_1 e^{kx-\omega t} and \psi_2 (x,t) = M_2 e^{i(kx-\omega t)} solve the de Broglie form of Schr. Eqn:

-\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m} \frac{\partial ^2 \psi}{\partial x^2}=i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}

for the first wave, i got:

-\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m} M_1 k^2 e^{kx-wt}=-i \omega \hbar M_1 e^{kx-\omega t}

for the second wave, i got:
\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m} M_2 k^2 e^{i(kx-\omega t)}= \omega \hbar M_2 e^{i(kx-\omega t)}

i was just wondering if I did these differentiation correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you did the differentiations correctly. I am confused by your task to show that neither function satisfies the Schrodinger equation when in fact both do as you have just shown
 
well, all I have to do is to show that they are not equal. Because if i simplify both of those equations, do not get the de Broglie relation of: \hbar \omega = \frac{\hbar ^2 k^2}{2m}
 
What do you mean...? You do get the deBroglie relation

p=\hbar k

and so E=\frac{p^{2}}{2m}

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K