Vertical asymptote with an epsilon-delta proof?

  • B
  • Thread starter mcastillo356
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Calculus
In summary, the conversation discusses the aim of proving a vertical asymptote for the function ##\frac{1}{x}## and the difficulties in finding a solution. The conversation mentions using the ordering of real numbers to show that the function is strictly decreasing and has no upper bound, leading to a vertical asymptote at zero. A proof is provided using a delta-epsilon proof, but it is noted that it is not a complete proof and more structure is needed.
  • #1
mcastillo356
Gold Member
593
322
TL;DR Summary
I've got a very recurred rational function for which I would like to find out the proof of the vertical asymptote.
Hi, PF

The aim is to prove how the approach from the left and right sides of the ##x##x axis eventually renders a vertical asymptote for the function ##\frac{1}{x}##. I've been searching in the textbook "Calculus", 7th edition, by Robert A. Adams and Christopher Essex, but I haven't found nothing but uncertain clues. Or naive proofs ( i.e., YouTube, mentioning the fact that the more we become near to zero at the abscissa, the less turns the ordinate). Any suggestion would be fine. Apologizes for not attempt provided.

Vertcal asymptote.jpg
Greetings!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Doesn't this follow directly from the ordering of the real numbers? From that you have that

(1) [itex]x^{-1}[/itex] is strictly decreasing for [itex]x > 0[/itex] ([itex]0 < x < y < 1 \Leftrightarrow 1 < 1/y < 1/x [/itex]).
(2) [itex]\{x^{-1} : x > 0 \}[/itex] has no upper bound (consider the sequence [itex]x_n = n^{-1}[/itex] for integer [itex]n > 0[/itex].)
(3) Multiplication by -1 reverses order.

EDIT: There is a vertical asymptote at zero for essentially the same reasons that [itex]x^{-1} \to 0[/itex] as [itex]x \to \infty[/itex]; it is easy to see that the curve [itex](x,x^{-1})[/itex] is symmetric about the line [itex](x,x)[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
  • #4
Hi, PF, I've been working with help a delta-epsilon proof of a left-sided limit when ##x\rightarrow{0^-}## for the function ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}##:

##\forall{\,\epsilon>0}\,\exists{\,\delta>0}##, such that if ##-\delta<x<0##, then ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon##

If we choose ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}>0##, and substitute in ##-\delta<x<0##, we obtain ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon<0##. Therefore it is proved that ##\lim_{x\rightarrow{0^-}}{\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty##

Is it right? Is ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}## the solution?

Greetings!
 
  • #5
mcastillo356 said:
Hi, PF, I've been working with help a delta-epsilon proof of a left-sided limit when ##x\rightarrow{0^-}## for the function ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}##:

##\forall{\,\epsilon>0}\,\exists{\,\delta>0}##, such that if ##-\delta<x<0##, then ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon##

If we choose ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}>0##, and substitute in ##-\delta<x<0##, we obtain ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon<0##. Therefore it is proved that ##\lim_{x\rightarrow{0^-}}{\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty##

Is it right? Is ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}## the solution?

Greetings!
It's the outline of a proof, but not a proof. Also, you begin by stating what it is you want to prove. It's not clear whether this is an assumption (which would be wrong) or a statement of what you are trying to prove.

You must be able to structure an elementary proof correctly before you can tackle more complicated proofs.
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356

FAQ: Vertical asymptote with an epsilon-delta proof?

What is a vertical asymptote?

A vertical asymptote is a line \( x = a \) where a function approaches infinity or negative infinity as the input approaches \( a \). This typically occurs when the function is undefined at that point, often due to a division by zero.

How do you identify vertical asymptotes in a function?

To identify vertical asymptotes, you can look for values of \( x \) that make the denominator of a rational function equal to zero while ensuring the numerator is not also zero at that point. Solving the equation \( \text{denominator} = 0 \) gives the potential locations of vertical asymptotes.

What is an epsilon-delta proof?

An epsilon-delta proof is a formal method used in calculus to rigorously define the limit of a function. It involves showing that for every positive number \( \epsilon \) (no matter how small), there exists a corresponding positive number \( \delta \) such that whenever the distance between the input and a certain point is less than \( \delta \), the distance between the function value and the limit is less than \( \epsilon \).

How can I use an epsilon-delta proof to show the existence of a vertical asymptote?

To use an epsilon-delta proof for a vertical asymptote at \( x = a \), you would demonstrate that as \( x \) approaches \( a \), the function \( f(x) \) approaches infinity. You would show that for any positive \( M \) (representing a large value), there exists a \( \delta > 0 \) such that if \( 0 < |x - a| < \delta \), then \( |f(x)| > M \). This illustrates that the function increases without bound as it approaches the vertical asymptote.

Can vertical asymptotes occur in non-rational functions?

Yes, vertical asymptotes can occur in non-rational functions, such as logarithmic functions or certain trigonometric functions. For example, the function \( f(x) = \ln(x) \) has a vertical asymptote at \( x = 0 \) because it approaches negative infinity as \( x \) approaches 0 from the right.

Similar threads

Back
Top