Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))

  • Thread starter calvino
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, if T is a cube with Vol(T)=0, then T can be covered by a union of sub cubes T1, T2, ..., Tn with a total volume less than epsilon. If g is differentiable and continuous, there is an S>0 and epsilon'>0 such that |x-y|<S implies |g(x)-g(y)|<epsilon'. However, this does not necessarily mean that the volume of g(T) will also be 0. To prove this, we can use the fact that for any e>0, we can cover T with cubes whose total volume <e. We can then use this to show that for any e>0, we can also cover g(T) with
  • #1
calvino
108
0
Prove that if Vol(T)=0, and g is differentiable with det Dg not equal to 0, then Vol(g(T))=0. T is a cube.


Here's my idea, although it doesn't incorporate the fact that det Dg <> 0.

Since Vol(T)=0, then T is a subset of a the union of sub cubes T1, T2, ..., Tn. Furthermore the sum of all volumes of Ti, i=1,2,...,n, < epsilon. [at this point, I am not sure how to choose my epsilon, but I suppose I can't know 'til later.]

since g is differentiable, g is continuous [ Do i have enough to say g is uniformly continuous? b/c that may help]. So for S>0, there is an epsilon' >0, such that |x-y|< S implies |g(x)- g(y)|< epsilon'.

Here is where I'm stuck. My next intuition is to take g of tiny intervals which make each Ti, and then show that the sum of all volumes g(Ti) < epsilon'-usingi the fact that g is continous. I'm just unsure how to go about doing so. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If T is a cube, how is Vol(T) = 0? Perhaps T is a cube in 4-dimensional space? I think you need to clarify the question.
So for S>0, there is an epsilon' >0, such that |x-y|< S implies |g(x)- g(y)|< epsilon'.
Where are you getting this from? This is false. If you're assuming that the continuity of g gives you this, then you're wrong. Let g be a real-valued function of one real variable, specifically, the exponential function. Then your claim above fails. Continuity says that for epsilon' > 0, there is an S > 0 such that |x - y| < S implies |g(x) - g(y)| < epsilon'.

For Vol(T) = 0 to be true, you must be able to cover T by some number of cubes (not necessarily finite) such that the total volume of all the cubes can be made arbitrarily small. If we're talking about the real line, for instance, then let's say T is some one-point set. We can cover it by a cube (open interval) of radius e/2 (for any e > 0 we want) centered at the element of T. Any set with a countable number of points can be covered by cubes in the following way:

Since the set is countable, order the elements t1, t2, ... (i.e. index the elements by the natural numbers). Around ti, place a cube Ci of volume e/2i. Then certainly, these cubes cover T and the sum of their volumes is:

[tex]\sum _{k=1} ^{\infty }\frac{e}{2^i} = e[/tex]

So for your problem, you are given the fact that for any e > 0, you can cover T by some number of cubes such that their total volume is < e. What can you say then about cubes that cover g? Also, what theorems do you know that involve det Dg <> 0?
 

FAQ: Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))

What does the equation "Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))" represent?

The equation represents a mathematical proof that the volume of a set T is equal to 0 if and only if the volume of the image of T under a function g is also equal to 0.

How is the "Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))" used in science?

This proof is commonly used in various branches of science, such as physics, chemistry, and biology, to show the relationship between the volume of a set and the volume of its image under a function.

What is the significance of this proof in scientific research?

The "Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))" is significant in scientific research as it allows for the analysis and verification of various mathematical models and equations used to describe natural phenomena.

Can this proof be applied to real-world situations?

Yes, this proof can be applied to real-world situations where volume is a relevant variable, such as in the study of fluid dynamics, chemical reactions, and biological systems.

Are there any limitations to this proof?

Like any mathematical proof, the "Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))" may have certain limitations or assumptions that need to be considered when applying it to specific situations. It is important to carefully analyze and validate the proof in each individual case.

Back
Top