Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))

  • Thread starter Thread starter calvino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if the volume of a set T is zero and g is a differentiable function with a non-zero determinant of its derivative, then the volume of the transformed set g(T) is also zero. Participants explore the implications of T being a subset of smaller cubes and the continuity of g, questioning whether uniform continuity can be assumed. A critical point raised is the need to clarify how continuity relates to the transformation of volumes, especially when considering specific functions like the exponential function. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of covering T with cubes of diminishing volume and how this relates to the volumes of the transformed set g(T). Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of applying continuity and differentiability in volume transformations.
calvino
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Prove that if Vol(T)=0, and g is differentiable with det Dg not equal to 0, then Vol(g(T))=0. T is a cube.


Here's my idea, although it doesn't incorporate the fact that det Dg <> 0.

Since Vol(T)=0, then T is a subset of a the union of sub cubes T1, T2, ..., Tn. Furthermore the sum of all volumes of Ti, i=1,2,...,n, < epsilon. [at this point, I am not sure how to choose my epsilon, but I suppose I can't know 'til later.]

since g is differentiable, g is continuous [ Do i have enough to say g is uniformly continuous? b/c that may help]. So for S>0, there is an epsilon' >0, such that |x-y|< S implies |g(x)- g(y)|< epsilon'.

Here is where I'm stuck. My next intuition is to take g of tiny intervals which make each Ti, and then show that the sum of all volumes g(Ti) < epsilon'-usingi the fact that g is continous. I'm just unsure how to go about doing so. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If T is a cube, how is Vol(T) = 0? Perhaps T is a cube in 4-dimensional space? I think you need to clarify the question.
So for S>0, there is an epsilon' >0, such that |x-y|< S implies |g(x)- g(y)|< epsilon'.
Where are you getting this from? This is false. If you're assuming that the continuity of g gives you this, then you're wrong. Let g be a real-valued function of one real variable, specifically, the exponential function. Then your claim above fails. Continuity says that for epsilon' > 0, there is an S > 0 such that |x - y| < S implies |g(x) - g(y)| < epsilon'.

For Vol(T) = 0 to be true, you must be able to cover T by some number of cubes (not necessarily finite) such that the total volume of all the cubes can be made arbitrarily small. If we're talking about the real line, for instance, then let's say T is some one-point set. We can cover it by a cube (open interval) of radius e/2 (for any e > 0 we want) centered at the element of T. Any set with a countable number of points can be covered by cubes in the following way:

Since the set is countable, order the elements t1, t2, ... (i.e. index the elements by the natural numbers). Around ti, place a cube Ci of volume e/2i. Then certainly, these cubes cover T and the sum of their volumes is:

\sum _{k=1} ^{\infty }\frac{e}{2^i} = e

So for your problem, you are given the fact that for any e > 0, you can cover T by some number of cubes such that their total volume is < e. What can you say then about cubes that cover g? Also, what theorems do you know that involve det Dg <> 0?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K