- #1
- 4,776
- 3,837
'The global magnitude-frequency relationship for large explosive volcanic eruptions' by J. Rougier, S. Sparks, K. Cashman, and S. Brown, in Earth and Planetary Science Letters.
(If someone can post a link to at least the abstract that would help)
Popular science version:
http://bristol.ac.uk/news/2017/november/volcanic-super-eruptions.html
The revision makes out the average time much less than what was posted in earlier papers:
Should we worry? Probably not. There are too many other potential major issues facing civilization in the very near term - compared to the geologic timeline. In other words 'A BIG boom is a lesser worry than a long litany of already manifesting problems.' (my down home version)
(If someone can post a link to at least the abstract that would help)
After analysing a database of geological records dated within the last 100,000 years, a team of scientists from the University of Bristol has discovered the average time between so-called volcanic super-eruptions is actually much less than previously thought.
Popular science version:
http://bristol.ac.uk/news/2017/november/volcanic-super-eruptions.html
The revision makes out the average time much less than what was posted in earlier papers:
... in our paper just published, we re-estimate this range as 5.2 - 48 thousand years, with a best guess value of 17 thousand years.”
Should we worry? Probably not. There are too many other potential major issues facing civilization in the very near term - compared to the geologic timeline. In other words 'A BIG boom is a lesser worry than a long litany of already manifesting problems.' (my down home version)