MHB Volume of a triangle type shape with a square bottom

AI Thread Summary
To find the volume of the shape with a square base in the xy-plane and a triangular upper section, the volume is calculated in two parts. The first part is a cube with a volume of 1 for \(0 \leq z \leq 1\). The second part consists of triangular cross-sections for \(1 \leq z \leq 2\), where the volume of each slice is derived from the formula \(dV = \frac{1}{2} x \, dx\). By integrating the triangular portion and adding the cube's volume, the total volume is determined to be \(V = 1 + \frac{1}{2} \int_0^1 x \, dx = \frac{5}{4}\). This method effectively combines geometric principles to derive the overall volume of the solid.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
How do I find the volume of this shape? The bottom is a square in the xy plane where \(0\leq x,y\leq 1\).

The object isn't a prism or pyramid so I am not sure what to do.

View attachment 1255
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
If I am interpreting this correctly, for $0\le z\le1$ you have a cube whose sieds are 1 unit in length, and for $1\le z\le2$ you have a solid whose cross-sections perpendicular to either the $x$ or $y$ axes are right triangles whose bases are 1 unit in length and altitudes vary linearly from 0 to 1, and so the volume by slicing is:

$$V=1+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 x\,dx=\frac{5}{4}$$
 
MarkFL said:
If I am interpreting this correctly, for $0\le z\le1$ you have a cube whose sieds are 1 unit in length, and for $1\le z\le2$ you have a solid whose cross-sections perpendicular to either the $x$ or $y$ axes are right triangles whose bases are 1 unit in length and altitudes vary linearly from 0 to 1, and so the volume by slicing is:

$$V=1+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 x\,dx=\frac{5}{4}$$

How did you derive this formula? Is the 1 the volume of the cube or is that part of the triangular shape?
 
Yes the 1 is the volume of the cubical portion of the solid, and for the upper part, the volume of a particular slice is:

$$dV=\frac{1}{2}bh\,dx$$

where the base is a constant 1 and the height is $x$, hence:

$$dV=\frac{1}{2}x\,dx$$

and so summing the slices (and adding in the cubical portion), we find:

$$V=1+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 x\,dx$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top