Volume of Solid of Revolution: Find Solution Here!

In summary: Hi MacLaddy!In summary, MacHi MacLaddy found a way to integrate \int \pi [f(x)]^2 dx and was close to getting the volume of the solid of revolution, but made a small error.
  • #1
MacLaddy1
52
0
Hey guys and gals. Hoping someone can help out with a problem I am finding myself stuck on.

The question goes as follows.

Solids of revolution. Find the volume of the solid of revolution. The region bounded by \(y= \frac{ln(x)}{\sqrt(x)}\), y=0 and x=2, revolved about the x-axis.

The problem I am having is trying to figure out how to separate the top and bottom of this fraction. These are some of the things I've looked at, but I don't think I can integrate any of them.

\([x^{\frac{1}{2}} * ln(x)]^2\)

\(\frac{[ln(x)]}{x}\)

And a few others.

I know that I have to integrate with \(\int \pi[\frac{[ln(x)]}{x}]dx\) from 1 to 2 ( I don't know how to get the limits on the integral)

Any help would be very much appreciated. This doesn't seem to be too hard of a problem, but I can't figure out how to get these separated so I can integrate.

Thanks,
Mac
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi MacLaddy!

I agree that the limits of integration are from x=1 to x=2, however you need to integrate \(\displaystyle \int \pi [f(x)]^2 dx\). It looks like you forgot to square the numerator as well or weren't able to write it in Latex. Either way I get that in this case \(\displaystyle [f(x)]^2=\left( \frac{\ln(x)}{\sqrt{x}} \right)^2= \left( \frac{[\ln(x)]^2}{x} \right)\). From here let \(\displaystyle u=\ln(x)\) and \(\displaystyle du=\frac{1}{x}dx\). From there it's doing a standard u-substitution integral and plugging everything in.
 
  • #3
Jameson said:
Hi MacLaddy!

I agree that the limits of integration are from x=1 to x=2, however you need to integrate \(\displaystyle \int \pi [f(x)]^2 dx\). It looks like you forgot to square the numerator as well or weren't able to write it in Latex. Either way I get that in this case \(\displaystyle [f(x)]^2=\left( \frac{\ln(x)}{\sqrt{x}} \right)^2= \left( \frac{[\ln(x)]^2}{x} \right)\). From here let \(\displaystyle u=\ln(x)\) and \(\displaystyle du=\frac{1}{x}dx\). From there it's doing a standard u-substitution integral and plugging everything in.
Ahh, I knew I was missing something simple. I didn't even notice the \(\frac{1}{x}\) u-substitution connection. I did remember to square the ln(x), I just forgot to write it in the Latex.

So we end up with \(\pi[\frac{[ln(x)]^3}{3}]^2_1\) = \(\frac{\pi(ln2)^3}{3} \approx 0.349\)

Does that look about right to you? (seems strange that I can't get a better answer. I think I still might be making a mistake)

Thank you very much. That helped a ton.
Mac

(by the way, how do you make your Latex readable? I need a magnifying glass for mine)
 
  • #4
If you use the tags [math][/math] then the Latex output will appear larger. If you want to keep using the current tags you are using then add \displaystyle after the opening tag and before any of the Latex code.

You're close but made a small error. If \(\displaystyle u=\ln(x)\) then our integral becomes \(\displaystyle \pi \int u^2du=\pi \frac{u^3}{3}\). From there you plug back in ln(x) for u and evaluate everything using the bounds.

EDIT: I see you've already caught your own error. Well done :)

I never make any promises that I'm 100% correct but your solution looks good to me. Hopefully I won't wake up to find others correcting a mistake I made but I can't find any in your work.
 
  • #5
Jameson said:
If you use the tags [math][/math] then the Latex output will appear larger. If you want to keep using the current tags you are using then add \displaystyle after the opening tag and before any of the Latex code.

You're close but made a small error. If \(\displaystyle u=\ln(x)\) then our integral becomes \(\displaystyle \pi \int u^2du=\pi \frac{u^3}{3}\). From there you plug back in ln(x) for u and evaluate everything using the bounds.

EDIT: I see you've already caught your own error. Well done :)

I never make any promises that I'm 100% correct but your solution looks good to me. Hopefully I won't wake up to find others correcting a mistake I made but I can't find any in your work.
The Math tags look simpler to use for me. More like the itex tags I am used to.

Thank you again, I really appreciate your help. That was my last question for the night, now I can get some sleep.

Mac
 

FAQ: Volume of Solid of Revolution: Find Solution Here!

What is the volume of solid of revolution?

The volume of solid of revolution is the amount of space occupied by a three-dimensional object that is formed by rotating a two-dimensional shape around an axis.

How do you find the volume of solid of revolution?

To find the volume of solid of revolution, you can use the formula V = π∫[a,b] (f(x))^2 dx, where f(x) is the function representing the shape and a and b are the limits of integration. Alternatively, you can use the disk method or the shell method depending on the shape of the object.

What is the difference between disk method and shell method?

The disk method involves slicing the solid into thin disks, finding the volume of each disk, and then summing up the volumes to get the total volume. The shell method, on the other hand, involves slicing the solid into thin hollow shells, finding the volume of each shell, and then summing up the volumes to get the total volume.

Can the volume of solid of revolution be negative?

No, the volume of solid of revolution cannot be negative. It represents the amount of space occupied by the object and therefore, it is always a positive value.

What are some real-life applications of finding the volume of solid of revolution?

The volume of solid of revolution is used in various fields such as engineering, architecture, and physics. It is used to calculate the volume of objects like cylinders, cones, and spheres, which are commonly found in many real-life objects and structures. For example, the volume of a water tank, a silo, or a tree trunk can be calculated using the volume of solid of revolution formula.

Back
Top