Volume of water discharged from a tank

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of water discharged from a tank through a rectangular opening, with specific dimensions related to the water surface. The initial approach uses Torricelli's theorem to derive the flow rate, assuming a uniform velocity, which is later identified as incorrect due to varying velocities across the opening. To accurately determine the volume flow rate, it is suggested to consider a differential element of height and integrate the flow rates across the height of the opening. This method accounts for the changing velocity of water as it exits the tank. The discussion emphasizes the need for a more refined approach to solve the problem correctly.
nemixus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rectangular opening is cut into the side of a large open-topped water tank. The opening has width w and height h2-h1, where h1 and h2 are distances of the opening below the water surface as identified in the figure. Determine the volume V of water that emerges from the opening per unit time (i.e. per second). You may assume that the surface area of the tank is extremely large compared to the area of the opening, but you should not assume that the water emerges from the opening with a single, uniform velocity. (Sorry for not able to show figure. Water is filled almost to the top. Opening on the side is about 1/9 of the tank.)

Homework Equations



Let Q = volume/second, A2 = Area of the hole, V2 = velocity of the hole

The Attempt at a Solution



Q = A2*V2
Torricelli's theorem:
v2 = sqrt(2*g*(h2 - h1))
Q/A2 = sqrt(2*g*(h2 - h1))
Q= w(h2 - h1)*sqrt(2*g*(h2 - h1))

It is after this point when I realized that I cannot assume the velocity is the same throughout the hole and I'm at lost how to approach this problem. Can I still solve the problem this way or do I have to do it a different way since the velocity is not constant throughout?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity varies with height so you should assume a differential cross sectional element of height dh and find the volume flow rate for that element(which would be a function of height). Then integrate under limits of the heights given for volume flowing out per unit time.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
61
Views
6K