Was the Spitfire Area-Ruled?

  • Thread starter Alan1000
  • Start date
In summary: The area-ruling of the Spitfire fuselage may have delayed the onset of compressibility effects, allowing for a higher Mach number during the dive.
  • #1
Alan1000
25
0
Was the Spitfire "area-ruled"?

Any aerodynamicists out there?

The Supermarine Spitfire, designed in the mid-1930s, supposedly enjoyed the highest mach rating of any propellor-driven fighter in World War 2. Even the Mustang, with its state-of-the-art laminar flow wing, could not match the Spitfire in the dive.

While looking at a photo of a Spitfire recently, it occurred to me that it had a somewhat area-ruled fuselage. If you look at a picture taken from slightly above, you can see that immediately behind the engine cylinder banks, roughly in line with the wing leading edge, there is a substantial tapering-off of fuselage cross-sectional area. This continues for some distance, then, behind the point of maximum chord thickness, the cockpit canopy causes cross sectional area to increase once more.

This "area-ruling" was presumably not designed as such, because the concept hadn't been thought of then (as far as I know). But how significant was it, I wonder, in delaying the onset of compressibility effects?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Area Rule was first noticed by Otto Frenzl at Junkers in 1943.
In 1951 in the USA it become the Whitcomb Area Rule.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_rule#History

I suspect Mitchell intuitively reduced the fuselage section at the wing so as to improve and not interfere with the lift of the wing.

In the book “The Big Show” by Pierre Clostermann, there is a report of two Strato-Spitfires, with pressurised cockpit canopies bolted down, in a vertical dive from 43,000 feet in pursuit of a photo-reconnaissance Messerschmitt Bf 109G.

“The Hun made full use of his GM-1 booster [Nitro injection] and kept his lead. At 27,000 feet my A.S. indicator showed 440 mph, i.e. a true speed of 600 mph. I had both hands on the stick and I leant on the controls with all my strength to keep the aircraft in a straight line. The slightest swerve would have crumpled up the wings. I felt my Spitfire jumping all the same, and I could see the paint cracking on the wings, while the engine was beginning to race.”
 

FAQ: Was the Spitfire Area-Ruled?

What is the "area rule" for the Spitfire?

The area rule for the Spitfire is a design principle that was developed by aerodynamicist Richard Whitcomb in the 1950s. It states that in order for an aircraft to reduce drag and increase efficiency, the cross-sectional area of the aircraft should be kept as constant as possible along the length of the fuselage.

Why was the Spitfire area-ruled?

The Spitfire was area-ruled in order to improve its aerodynamic performance. The original design of the aircraft had a "waisted" or narrow fuselage, which created a significant amount of drag. By applying the area rule, engineers were able to reshape the fuselage and reduce drag, making the Spitfire faster and more maneuverable.

How did the area rule affect the performance of the Spitfire?

The area rule had a significant impact on the performance of the Spitfire. By reducing drag, the aircraft was able to fly faster and more efficiently, making it a more effective fighter plane. The area rule also improved the handling and stability of the Spitfire, making it easier for pilots to control.

Was the area rule originally intended for the Spitfire?

No, the area rule was not originally intended for the Spitfire. It was a principle developed by Whitcomb for use in supersonic aircraft, but it was later applied to the Spitfire and other subsonic aircraft to improve their performance.

Are other aircraft area-ruled like the Spitfire?

Yes, many other aircraft have been area-ruled to improve their aerodynamic performance. This includes the Concorde, the F-16 Fighting Falcon, and the Boeing 747. The area rule continues to be an important design principle in the development of aircraft today.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top