- #1
Wondermine
It is postulated that there was a "Dark Age" subsequent to the so called Big Bang.
The "matter" subsequent to the Big Bang would be composed of Quarks,if there was no light postulated for that time.
This would indicate that the forces present would be only the Strong Force.
The Strong Force of Quarks has an extremely small/short "reach". The smallest "reach" of any known force.
If the energy ,as postulate from observation, was accelerating at an exponential rate in the form of Quarks how then could the strong force possibly enforce a coalescence of quarks to form atoms thereby allowing subsequent electromagnetic forces to allow light? If the distances between Quarks accelerated exponentially ,would that not lead to an increasing improbability of nucleus formations?
The "matter" subsequent to the Big Bang would be composed of Quarks,if there was no light postulated for that time.
This would indicate that the forces present would be only the Strong Force.
The Strong Force of Quarks has an extremely small/short "reach". The smallest "reach" of any known force.
If the energy ,as postulate from observation, was accelerating at an exponential rate in the form of Quarks how then could the strong force possibly enforce a coalescence of quarks to form atoms thereby allowing subsequent electromagnetic forces to allow light? If the distances between Quarks accelerated exponentially ,would that not lead to an increasing improbability of nucleus formations?