- #1
Tuneman
- 41
- 0
I am having trouble understanding the solution to the wave equation:
this is thought of as the final solution to the PDE:
but I see that:
is a solution to the function. But what I don't get is why D'Alembert's Solution isn't in terms of sines and cosines like that solution right above.
Is it because D'Albemerts is a gereneral solution, and the other is a specific solution? If so, still how come the general solution to the problem isn't expressed as a wave, and instead of some arbitrary function g(x-ct)?
this is thought of as the final solution to the PDE:
but I see that:
is a solution to the function. But what I don't get is why D'Alembert's Solution isn't in terms of sines and cosines like that solution right above.
Is it because D'Albemerts is a gereneral solution, and the other is a specific solution? If so, still how come the general solution to the problem isn't expressed as a wave, and instead of some arbitrary function g(x-ct)?