Ways of measuring open quantum systems

In summary, the theory of open quantum systems suggests that the measurement statistics of many-body systems can be expressed in terms of a reduced density matrix obtained by tracing over irrelevant degrees of freedom. The reduced density matrix can be defined by a sum over the basis of the first subsystem. The dynamics of the density matrix is induced by the Hamiltonian acting on the system. The question arises of whether the density matrix has physical significance or is simply a mathematical construct for interpreting statistics in experiments. Memory effects may be significant in certain setups, such as a system with entangled photons. It may be possible to choose which part of a many-body system can be measured, but there may be fundamental constraints on what measurements can be performed. Even a system of two particles
  • #1
Couchyam
122
18
TL;DR Summary
How many ways can a quantum subsystem be measured (without its complement?)
At the heart of the theory of open quantum systems is the idea that the measurement statistics of many-body systems can be expressed in terms of a reduced density matrix, obtained by tracing over degrees of freedom that are irrelevant to the system of interest.
In general, given a pure state ##|\psi\rangle## in a Hilbert space that is a tensor product of two subsystems, ##\mathcal H = \mathcal H_1\otimes \mathcal H_2##, where ##\mathcal H_1## has orthonormal basis ##|e_a\rangle## and ##\mathcal H_2## basis ##|e_b\rangle##, the reduced density matrix can be defined by
\begin{align*}
\rho_{1,aa'} = \sum_{b} \psi_{ab}\psi^*_{a'b},\quad \psi_{ab}|e_a\rangle|e_b\rangle \equiv |\psi\rangle
\end{align*}
It is easy to check that if ##A## is an operator that acts on the first system alone (i.e. ##A = A_1\otimes \mathbb I_2##, where ##\mathbb I_2## is the identity on ##\mathcal H_2##), then ##\langle A\rangle = \tr(\rho A)##.
The dynamics of the density matrix ##\rho## is induced by whatever Hamiltonian acts on ##|\psi\rangle \in \mathcal H_1\otimes \mathcal H_2##. My question is essentially whether ##\rho## can be thought of as having physical significance beyond a convenient mathematical construct for interpreting quantum statistics in certain experiments. As I understand it, the Hilbert space ##\mathcal H_2## is typically modeled as a large reservoir with a continuum of states, such as a photon/massless gauge boson, or the phonons in a crystal lattice, and this limits the extent to which memory effects are significant, although in the case of a photon field, memory effects could be significant in, for example, a system consisting of particles suspended in a laser cavity or opto-mechanical setup (i.e. where entangled photons could reflect back toward the 'matter' system of interest.) Is it generally possible to "choose" which part of a many-body system can be measured, or are there non-trivial fundamental constraints on what measurements can actually be performed? For example, would it be possible to choose to measure the state of a single spin in a coherently coupled spin network, or would the photon that transmits the information inevitably be entangled with other parts of the system? Apologies if this question isn't worded especially clearly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It doesn't need to be a many-body system. It can be a system of 2 particles, for example. In fact, even 1 particle is sufficient, in which case ##{\cal H}_1## can be the spin space, while ##{\cal H}_2## can be the position space.
 

FAQ: Ways of measuring open quantum systems

What are open quantum systems?

Open quantum systems are quantum systems that interact with their external environment. Unlike closed quantum systems, which are isolated and evolve according to the Schrödinger equation, open quantum systems experience decoherence and dissipation due to their interaction with surroundings, making their behavior more complex to analyze.

Why is it important to measure open quantum systems?

Measuring open quantum systems is crucial for understanding real-world quantum phenomena, as most practical quantum systems are not isolated. This understanding is essential for developing quantum technologies such as quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing, where environmental interactions significantly impact performance and reliability.

What are the common methods for measuring open quantum systems?

Common methods for measuring open quantum systems include quantum state tomography, which reconstructs the quantum state by measuring different observables; quantum process tomography, which characterizes the dynamics of the system; and continuous measurement techniques, which monitor the system over time to study its evolution and the effects of environmental interactions.

How does quantum state tomography work in open quantum systems?

Quantum state tomography involves performing a series of measurements on an ensemble of identically prepared quantum systems to reconstruct the density matrix that describes the state. For open quantum systems, this process must account for decoherence and noise, often requiring more sophisticated statistical techniques to accurately infer the quantum state.

What are the challenges in measuring open quantum systems?

Challenges in measuring open quantum systems include dealing with decoherence and noise from the environment, which can obscure the true quantum state. Additionally, the complexity of the system's dynamics due to interactions with the environment makes it difficult to model and predict behavior. Advanced techniques and error-correction methods are often required to obtain accurate measurements.

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
754
Replies
1
Views
802
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
77
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top