Weak Localization: Explaining the Argument

  • Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Weak
In summary: So, In summary, weak localization is a phenomenon where electrons in a conductor can take multiple paths back to their origin, including time-reversed paths. The classical return probability for this is represented by P_classical = A+2 + A_2, while the quantum mechanical return probability is twice this due to constructive interference. The argument for weak localization suggests that loops in the paths of the electron will always interfere constructively, leading to a higher chance of the electron staying in the same place. However, this phenomenon is more noticeable in lower dimensions such as thin wires and films. While paths from different loops may interfere and average out, the overall effect is still present due to an equal chance of constructive or destructive interference.
  • #1
aaaa202
1,169
2
A very handwaving argument for weak localization is the following:
In a conductor the electron can take many paths leading back to its origin. Consider two of these, being the time reversed of each other and denote them +,-. The classical return probability is:
P_classical = A+2 + A_2
While the quantum mechanical (due to constructive interference) is twice this:
P_quantum = lA+exp(iθ)+A-exp(iθ)l2

The problem I see with this argument is this: Would a path in general not also interfere with other paths besides its own time reversed path? Am I misunderstanding or how exactly is one to interpret this argument.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you asking if it interferes with the paths of other electrons?
Or are you asking if the path interferes with other possible paths of the same electron?
 
  • #3
The last one. Why is only the time reversed path for the same electron relevant.
 
  • #4
All possible paths of the electron will interfere, some constructively and some destructively. If there were no loops on average the constructive intereferences would be equal to the destructive intereferences and the classical result would be achieved. However if you have possible loops the each way paths round the loops will always interfere constructively. This means the electrons have slightly more chance of staying in the same place than moving somewhere else. The incidence of these loops is higher in lower dimensions so the effect is more noticeable in thin wires and films.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
But my question was. Will the paths from different loops not interfere and average out the contribution from the loops?
 
  • #6
Sure, but the paths from two different loops with have an equal chance of interfering constructively or destructively.
 

FAQ: Weak Localization: Explaining the Argument

What is weak localization?

Weak localization is a phenomenon in condensed matter physics where electron transport is affected by disorder in a system.

How does weak localization occur?

Weak localization occurs when electrons in a system encounter scattering from impurities or defects, causing their paths to interfere with each other.

How is weak localization different from strong localization?

Weak localization is a subtle effect that occurs when the mean free path of an electron is much larger than the localization length, while strong localization occurs when the mean free path is comparable to or smaller than the localization length.

Why is weak localization important?

Weak localization is important because it can provide insights into the properties of a system, such as the degree of disorder or the presence of magnetic fields. It also has practical applications in the development of electronic devices.

What is the argument for weak localization?

The argument for weak localization is based on the quantum interference of electron paths, which leads to a reduction in the conductivity of a system. This effect is stronger at low temperatures and in the presence of magnetic fields.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top