Welcome All: Unravelling the Mysteries of Photons

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons Welcome
Nios
3
0
welcome all


I'd like to know if there is a way to calculate how manny photons are in this universe. We can calculate the mass of the universe so is there a way to claculate the number of photons? I also would like to clear some things i don't understand. I read that if people build a ship that will be able to reach the speed of light then the moment it reaches the speed of light it will have infinite mass, energy, gravity, force and magnetism. Does a photon have all these?

All answers are welcome.
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A photon has no rest mass so it ALWAYS travels at the speed of light (in vacuum), in materials, light travels slower than c.

Yes, one can, we can evaulate the photon energy/number density fairly easy to a certain accuracy.
 
A photon's energy is just proportional to its frequency f. Since it is massless, it has no kinetic energy, or gravity for that matter. It will always travel at the speed of light.
 
BAnders1 said:
A photon's energy is just proportional to its frequency f. Since it is massless, it has no kinetic energy, or gravity for that matter. It will always travel at the speed of light.

so why do we have a kinetic term in the QED Lagrangian for the electromagnetic field, and why is light affected by gravity? Gravity is proportional to the energy-momentum tensor.
 
Nios said:
I'd like to know if there is a way to calculate how manny photons are in this universe. We can calculate the mass of the universe so is there a way to claculate the number of photons?

We don't know the mass of the universe with much accuracy, nor do we know how much matter, dark matter, or dark energy there is with much accuracy. But that isn't necessary because you can measure photon spectrum (its a black-body spectrum at about 2.7 degrees K) and flux directly and its fairly even from all directions, and we have a fair* estimate of the volume of the universe (although the concept of universe volume in this context is a little complicated because we need to compensate for the fact that we see the past at great distances because of the finite speed of light). So you could calculate how many photons there are from that direct measurement. *Its actually the surface area of a hypersphere (probably), and this assumes we have a fair estimate of its shape. Maybe we don't.

Nios said:
I also would like to clear some things i don't understand. I read that if people build a ship that will be able to reach the speed of light then the moment it reaches the speed of light it will have infinite mass, energy, gravity, force and magnetism. Does a photon have all these?

A photon has no rest mass. That's why it can be "accelerated" to c without infinities rearing their ugly heads. -- at least that's the simplistic way to look at it. its debatable whether a photon's existence in transit has much meaning.
 
Last edited:
Nios said:
I read that if people build a ship that will be able to reach the speed of light then the moment it reaches the speed of light it will have infinite mass, energy, gravity, force and magnetism.
No one else quite addressed this misconception.

No ship made of matter will ever be able to reach the speed of light. Matter cannot travel at c.

As it approaches (though never reaches) c, its mass will approach infinity. (Its length will also approach zero.)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top