- #1
sweicher
- 1
- 0
Hi guys. New here.
I'm reading philosophy, and this philosopher uses some mathematics which I am having trouble understanding. I am interested in both an understanding of what the signs mean (in themselves and in this context, please), and why someone regularly chooses to use these functions.
I have no pre-knowledge about mathematics, so please, if you would explain in a simple and detailed way, I will pledge you my eternal love. I will give you a transcript of the difficult page. This is a difficult page philosophically as well, so if it sounds like nonsense, don't worry. But if you could make any sense of any of the math signs used, I'd be happy ever after.
Here is what the guy is saying: (For those of interest, David Chalmers, The conscious mind p. 61-2)
"All this can be formalized by noting that the full story about referenes in counterfactual worlds is not determined a priori by a singly indexd function f : W -> R. Instead, reference in a counterfactucal world depends both o that world and on the way the actual world turns out. That is, a concept determines a doubly indexed function:
F : W* X W -> R
Where W* is the space of centered possible worlds, and W is the space of ordinary possible worlds. The first parameter represents contexts of utterance, or ways the actual world might turn out, whereas the second parameter represents circumstances of evaluation, or counterfactual posssible worlds. Equivalently, a concept determines a family of functions:
Fv : W -> R
For each v ∈ W* represents a way the actual world might turn out, where Fv(w) = F(v, w). For "water", if a is a world in which watery stuff is h2o, then Fa picks out h2o in all possbile worlds. If our world had turned out to be a different world b in which watery stuff was XYZ, then the relevant application conditions would have been specified by Fb.
The function F is determined a priori. as all a posteriori factors are included in its parameters. From F we can recover both of our singly indexed intensions. The primary intension is the function f : W* -> R determinered by the "diagonal" mapping f : w ↦ F(w, W'), where w' is identical to w except that the center is removed. This is the function whereby reference in the actual world is fixed. The seconday intension is the mapping Fa : w ↦ F(a, w), where a is our actual world. An immediate consequence is that the primary intension and secondary intension coincidde in their application to the actual world: f(a) = Fa(a') = F(a, a').
(...)
More formally, let D : R X W -> R be a "projection" operator that goes through a class picked out in some world to members of "that" class in anotther oossible world. Then the secondary intension Fa is just the function D(f(a),-), which we can think of as dthat applied to the intension given by f."
So, I know the basics of set theory (meaning approximately the things listed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory#Basic_concepts_and_notation ). But I do not understand, what a singly or doubly indexed function is. I do not know what it means when the f is spelled in lower case or upper case (is that just a way to formalize a singly and a doubly function, respectively?). And yeah, the rest of the mathematical talk doesn't make much sense either. But I am very, very eager to learn it. I am writing about this text in a big exam right now, so any fast reply would be regarded with the greatest gratitude.
If you are able to just explain one or two of these symbols, or perhaps one or two of the paragraphs, I'd be ten steps closer to understanding the whole. Alternatively, if you have a link for a youtube clip or something, which explores and explains the signs used above, that would be w
I'm reading philosophy, and this philosopher uses some mathematics which I am having trouble understanding. I am interested in both an understanding of what the signs mean (in themselves and in this context, please), and why someone regularly chooses to use these functions.
I have no pre-knowledge about mathematics, so please, if you would explain in a simple and detailed way, I will pledge you my eternal love. I will give you a transcript of the difficult page. This is a difficult page philosophically as well, so if it sounds like nonsense, don't worry. But if you could make any sense of any of the math signs used, I'd be happy ever after.
Here is what the guy is saying: (For those of interest, David Chalmers, The conscious mind p. 61-2)
"All this can be formalized by noting that the full story about referenes in counterfactual worlds is not determined a priori by a singly indexd function f : W -> R. Instead, reference in a counterfactucal world depends both o that world and on the way the actual world turns out. That is, a concept determines a doubly indexed function:
F : W* X W -> R
Where W* is the space of centered possible worlds, and W is the space of ordinary possible worlds. The first parameter represents contexts of utterance, or ways the actual world might turn out, whereas the second parameter represents circumstances of evaluation, or counterfactual posssible worlds. Equivalently, a concept determines a family of functions:
Fv : W -> R
For each v ∈ W* represents a way the actual world might turn out, where Fv(w) = F(v, w). For "water", if a is a world in which watery stuff is h2o, then Fa picks out h2o in all possbile worlds. If our world had turned out to be a different world b in which watery stuff was XYZ, then the relevant application conditions would have been specified by Fb.
The function F is determined a priori. as all a posteriori factors are included in its parameters. From F we can recover both of our singly indexed intensions. The primary intension is the function f : W* -> R determinered by the "diagonal" mapping f : w ↦ F(w, W'), where w' is identical to w except that the center is removed. This is the function whereby reference in the actual world is fixed. The seconday intension is the mapping Fa : w ↦ F(a, w), where a is our actual world. An immediate consequence is that the primary intension and secondary intension coincidde in their application to the actual world: f(a) = Fa(a') = F(a, a').
(...)
More formally, let D : R X W -> R be a "projection" operator that goes through a class picked out in some world to members of "that" class in anotther oossible world. Then the secondary intension Fa is just the function D(f(a),-), which we can think of as dthat applied to the intension given by f."
So, I know the basics of set theory (meaning approximately the things listed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory#Basic_concepts_and_notation ). But I do not understand, what a singly or doubly indexed function is. I do not know what it means when the f is spelled in lower case or upper case (is that just a way to formalize a singly and a doubly function, respectively?). And yeah, the rest of the mathematical talk doesn't make much sense either. But I am very, very eager to learn it. I am writing about this text in a big exam right now, so any fast reply would be regarded with the greatest gratitude.
If you are able to just explain one or two of these symbols, or perhaps one or two of the paragraphs, I'd be ten steps closer to understanding the whole. Alternatively, if you have a link for a youtube clip or something, which explores and explains the signs used above, that would be w