MHB What are some common traps to watch out for in word problems?

AI Thread Summary
Common traps in word problems include ambiguous units of measurement and unclear definitions of terms, which can lead to misinterpretation of the problem. For example, the distinction between raw and refined quantities can significantly alter the calculations needed. Understanding the problem's context and translating it into mathematical terms is often the most challenging aspect. Attention to detail in wording is crucial, as these problems frequently contain built-in confusion. Properly analyzing each component can help avoid mistakes and improve problem-solving accuracy.
DeusAbscondus
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Hi folks could someone please check my calculations contained in attached file?
thanks.

(incidentally, how can i create a link to such files in the future, weaving them into my text?)

Deus(has gone)
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: exponential decay problem

Yes, it is correct, if $t$ represents hours (it is not made clear in the problem what the unit of $t$ is). For instance, if $t$ was in minutes, then you need to substitute $t = 4 \times 60 = 240$. I think it is meant to be hours though.

Be careful what each symbol means. For instance, in the first question, it says "500kg of raw sugar has been refined to 380kg". Does that mean that there is 380kg of raw sugar remaining, and that there is 500 - 380 = 120kg of refined sugar, or the opposite? Or something else? (sorry, I am not familiar with sugar refining) This will affect the meaning of (and answers to) the questions.

In word problems the hardest part is often (at least to me) understanding what the problem is and converting it to math. They often have little traps built-in to confuse people and make them pay attention to wording, it can be frustrating actually.​
 
Last edited:
Re: exponential decay problem

Thanks Bacterius,
Worked out where I was reading the question wrong.
But it helped - as always - to have another set of eyes look at my work.

Cheers mate,
D'Abs
Bacterius said:
Yes, it is correct, if $t$ represents hours (it is not made clear in the problem what the unit of $t$ is). For instance, if $t$ was in minutes, then you need to substitute $t = 4 \times 60 = 240$. I think it is meant to be hours though.

Be careful what each symbol means. For instance, in the first question, it says "500kg of raw sugar has been refined to 380kg". Does that mean that there is 380kg of raw sugar remaining, and that there is 500 - 380 = 120kg of refined sugar, or the opposite? Or something else? (sorry, I am not familiar with sugar refining) This will affect the meaning of (and answers to) the questions.

In word problems the hardest part is often (at least to me) understanding what the problem is and converting it to math. They often have little traps built-in to confuse people and make them pay attention to wording, it can be frustrating actually.​
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top