I What are some good arguments against mathematics being discovered?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the debate over whether mathematics is invented or discovered, with participants suggesting it is a combination of both. Mathematicians create methods to understand and apply mathematical concepts to other fields, while certain mathematical truths are revealed through proofs. The conversation highlights the difficulty of discussing this topic, as it is often seen as a settled matter, akin to questioning the sun's rising direction. Examples from notable figures like Feynman and Hardy illustrate the interplay between pure mathematics and practical applications. Ultimately, the complexity of the debate suggests it may remain unresolved.
murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
What are some good arguments against mathematics being discovered (or for it being invented)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
IMO, it's a mixture. On one hand, mathematicians invent methods and techniques that humans can understand. Also, many techniques are invented to apply mathematics in other subjects such as physics, astronomy, etc. On the other hand, many truths are discovered when their proofs are derived.
 
Seeing as how mathematics has already been discovered, this question is counterfactual. Compare with "What are some good arguments against the sun having risen in the east this morning?" - there aren't any.

That makes it hard to conduct a sensible discussion within the forum rules so this thread is closed. (As with any thread closure, we can reopen for further comments if someone has more to say - PM any mentor to ask).

@murshid_islam you might want to read https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/wigner.pdf
 
In reply, this is a debate that will never be answered. We develop math from patterns we see and we develop math for some abstract problem we created. Much of math is discovered as in the pythagorean theorem but there are areas of math like topology that worlds unto themselves and later become tools in more practical matters.

Feynman had a talk (Cornell Messenger Lectures) about needing math for a 3D problem and the mathematician in his story well I have just the answer an N dimensional mathematics. Feynman would say no no no, I just want it for 3D use. Later he sheepishly goes back to the mathematician and asks for the N dimensional math.



Prof GH Hardy was proud that his work on pure mathematics had no bearing on anything military or anything practical until someone realized it could help in cryptography. He detested war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._H._Hardy

Here is a whole reddit thread on the debate:



and a BBC program on it:

https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/was-maths-invented-or-discovered

As well as NOVA's The Great Math Mystery

 
  • Like
Likes murshid_islam
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top