- #36
- 7,531
- 3,336
Ouabache said:Whether recent or historic, selection pressures allow useful traits to be passed on while others are discarded. Two eyes gives us depth perception, a distinct advantage over creatures with a single eye. With this added piece of information, we can detect and escape predators with greater ease than those with one eye. We are also less likely to walk off a cliff. With only those two examples, there would be a distinct selection pressure for keeping two eyes. Similarly with our ears, we perceive direction information because our ears receive incoming sounds stereophonically. We perceive which direction a threatening predator is approaching and thereby have a better chance take evasive action over those with a single ear.
Monique raises a good point, that a single circular or oval nasal passage would also be bilaterally symmetric. Animals could have just as easily, generated this phenotypic variant. So begs the question, what benefit is there having two nostrils over a single one? For example, does it empower animals to detect food or a mate more efficiently?
You have to be careful about this type of argument. For example, surely there would be an advantage to being able to see a full 360 degrees (or 4*pi steradians), but not many animals have that trait. It's similar to asking "Why is Ca++ used as a second messenger molecule?" Evolution (at the molecular level) tends to explore a very large solution space, and often finds several equivalent solutions- homologous proteins.