What Are the Concerns Surrounding David Hicks' Trial?

  • News
  • Thread starter alexandra
  • Start date
In summary, David Hicks, an Australian citizen, has been living in limbo for close to four years due to the Australian government's refusal to protect his rights. He has recently resorted to applying for British citizenship. Hicks has finally been charged and a trial date has been set, but there are concerns about the legal protections and fairness of the military tribunal procedures. There are also concerns about the Australian government's lack of intervention on Hicks' behalf. This case raises questions about the right to a fair trial and the treatment of "illegal combatants." Links to websites with more information about Hicks' detention are provided.
  • #1
alexandra
David Hicks has now been living 'in limbo' for close to four years (http://www.fairgofordavid.org/htmlfiles/media2005pt2/smhwebdiary23Jul05.htm) and, due to the Australian government's refusal to do anything about protecting its citizen's rights, he recently resorted to applying for British citizenship:
While Australia is one of the few EU or Commonwealth Governments not to have protested about Guantanamo, Britain has brought home nine former prisoners, denouncing the lack of legal protections and saying they do not accept that the US military tribunals offer sufficient guarantees of a fair trial.
Reference: http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2005/s1468280.htm
David has, finally, been charged and a trial date set:
He faces charges of conspiracy, attempted murder by an unprivileged belligerent and aiding the enemy.
"The presiding officer has set the date for the first hearing in the Hicks commission for November 18," Pentagon spokesman Major Michael Shavers said.
Reference: http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200509/s1468936.htm
However, one has to wonder what "an unprivileged belligerent" is, and the term "aiding the enemy" is pretty broad (as is the charge of "conspiracy"). Independent legal observer for the Law Council of Australia, Lex Lasry QC, also raised a number of concerns regarding the military tribunal procedures, eg. Lasry writes:
If there is properly admissible evidence to suggest that he has committed criminal offences and the process by which he is to be tried is properly constituted, independent and fair then there can be no complaint. However, I dealt with some of those issues in my first report. The concept of “properly admissible” evidence, appropriately formulated charges and a fair and independent process are all problematic in this case. More: http://www.fairgofordavid.org/htmlfiles/media2005pt2/smhwebdiary23Jul05.htm
Now *this* is something to worry about...
Here are links to websites with more information about Hicks' detention: http://www.fairgofordavid.org/htmlfiles/main.htm and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks
alex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
alexandra said:
David Hicks has now been living 'in limbo' for close to four years (http://www.fairgofordavid.org/htmlfiles/media2005pt2/smhwebdiary23Jul05.htm) and, due to the Australian government's refusal to do anything about protecting its citizen's rights, he recently resorted to applying for British citizenship: David has, finally, been charged and a trial date set:However, one has to wonder what "an unprivileged belligerent" is, and the term "aiding the enemy" is pretty broad (as is the charge of "conspiracy"). Independent legal observer for the Law Council of Australia, Lex Lasry QC, also raised a number of concerns regarding the military tribunal procedures, eg. Lasry writes:Now *this* is something to worry about...
Here are links to websites with more information about Hicks' detention: http://www.fairgofordavid.org/htmlfiles/main.htm and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks
alex
Sounds like the Patriot Act. What about the right to a speedy trial (the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) - nothing like that in Australia?
 
  • #3
SOS2008 said:
Sounds like the Patriot Act. What about the right to a speedy trial (the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) - nothing like that in Australia?
This isn't in Australia, though - and we have our very own version of the Patriot Act (well, soon - it's the "Anti-Terrorist Bill" at the moment, but the Howard Government is determined to pass it - complete with 'shoot-to-kill' provisions, before Christmas; excellent Christmas present, no?). David Hicks is an 'illegal combatant' who has been languishing in Guantanamo Bay for close on four years now; has this not been on US news? He is an Australian citizen, but unlike the British and Canadian governments who have intervened on behalf of their citizens, the Australian government has done nothing to ensure that his rights to a fair trial (or even to be charged with any crime) were met. I'm shocked that his case has not been on US news (but I guess I'm not surprised):frown:
 

FAQ: What Are the Concerns Surrounding David Hicks' Trial?

What were the specific charges against David Hicks in his trial?

The specific charges against David Hicks were providing material support for terrorism and attempted murder by an unprivileged belligerent.

What were the concerns surrounding the legality of David Hicks' trial?

There were concerns about the legality of David Hicks' trial, specifically regarding the use of evidence obtained through torture and the lack of due process and fair trial rights.

Was David Hicks' trial conducted according to international law?

Many experts argue that David Hicks' trial did not adhere to international law, as evidenced by the use of evidence obtained through torture and the lack of due process rights.

What role did the United States play in David Hicks' trial?

The United States played a significant role in David Hicks' trial, as he was held in Guantanamo Bay and tried by a military commission established by the US government.

What impact did David Hicks' trial have on the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay?

David Hicks' trial brought attention to the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay and raised concerns about the use of torture and lack of due process rights for these individuals. It also sparked debates and discussions about the legality and morality of detaining individuals without charge or trial.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Back
Top