- #1
ibc
- 82
- 0
Hey
I've been reading the basic definitions for model theory, and got a bit confused, maybe someone can help me?
That's how I understood the definitions:
An m-Type in a model M is a set of formulas (with m variables), such that it is finitely satisfiable
An m-Type over A in M is a set of formulas (with m variables) in the language that includes personal constants for all the terms in A, such that it is finitely satisfiable
M is [tex]\lambda[/tex]-compact if any type in M with cardinality smaller than [tex]\lambda[/tex] is fulfilled in M.
M is [tex]\lambda[/tex]-saturated if any type over A in M, such that the cardinality of A is smaller than [tex]\lambda[/tex] is fulfilled in M.
So the way it seems: a structure which is 0-saturated is [tex]\lambda[/tex]-compact for all [tex]\lambda[/tex]?
Is there something wrong with my conclusion?
Is there something wrong with the definitions?
Thanks
I've been reading the basic definitions for model theory, and got a bit confused, maybe someone can help me?
That's how I understood the definitions:
An m-Type in a model M is a set of formulas (with m variables), such that it is finitely satisfiable
An m-Type over A in M is a set of formulas (with m variables) in the language that includes personal constants for all the terms in A, such that it is finitely satisfiable
M is [tex]\lambda[/tex]-compact if any type in M with cardinality smaller than [tex]\lambda[/tex] is fulfilled in M.
M is [tex]\lambda[/tex]-saturated if any type over A in M, such that the cardinality of A is smaller than [tex]\lambda[/tex] is fulfilled in M.
So the way it seems: a structure which is 0-saturated is [tex]\lambda[/tex]-compact for all [tex]\lambda[/tex]?
Is there something wrong with my conclusion?
Is there something wrong with the definitions?
Thanks