What are the flaws in Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory?

In summary, the theory that the "Strong Nuclear Force" and Gravity are the same force faces a major flaw in overcoming the Electrostatic Repulsion of protons in the nucleus. Additionally, it relies heavily on the concept of element 115, which has been discovered to be unstable. Further research is needed to determine if there exists an "island of stability" for heavy elements and their exotic properties. Bob Lazar's involvement in this theory is questionable and it may be worth exploring the concept without his influence. More information can be found on the Physics Forums website.
  • #1
Russell E. Rierson
384
0
What are the flaws with this theory?

http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/NGFT_Chapter_8.htm


The largest stumbling block to proving that the “Strong Nuclear Force” and Gravity are one and the same force is overcoming the Electrostatic Repulsion of the protons in the nucleus...

:eek: :eek: :eek:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
One major flaw with it, is that it relies on the "element 115" concept of Bob Lazar. But element 115 was discovered to be unstable, according to many sources on the internet.

So the question becomes "Does there exist the island of stability for certain heavy elements in the 115 -->upwards range, that have interesting & exotic properties?"
 
  • #3
I don't know if Lazar was pulling from real science or just more of his made up physics. At times he does a pretty good job of mixing the two. You might ask the question directly - without Lazar in play.

https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65
 

FAQ: What are the flaws in Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory?

What is Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory?

Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory is a scientific theory that attempts to explain the forces of gravity between subatomic particles, such as protons and neutrons, within the nucleus of an atom. It proposes that there is a specific type of field, called the nuclear gravitation field, which is responsible for the attractive force between these particles.

How does Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory differ from other theories of gravity?

Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory differs from other theories, such as General Relativity, in that it focuses specifically on explaining the forces of gravity between subatomic particles. It also proposes a different type of field, the nuclear gravitation field, as the source of this force.

What evidence supports Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory?

Currently, there is not enough experimental evidence to fully support or refute Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory. However, some studies have shown that the gravitational force between subatomic particles within the nucleus may be stronger than what is predicted by other theories, which could potentially support the existence of the nuclear gravitation field.

Can Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory be tested?

Yes, Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory can be tested through various experiments and observations. For example, scientists could measure the strength of the gravitational force between subatomic particles and compare it to the predictions of the theory. They could also look for other observable effects, such as changes in the behavior of particles within a nuclear reactor, that may be caused by the nuclear gravitation field.

What are the potential implications of Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory?

If proven to be valid, Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory could have significant implications for our understanding of the fundamental forces of nature. It could also potentially lead to new technologies and applications, such as improved nuclear reactors or new methods for harnessing energy from the nuclear gravitation field.

Back
Top