What are the guidelines for speculation in a mainstream science community?

  • Thread starter Sithikor
  • Start date
In summary, the guidelines for speculation in a mainstream science community are based on rigorous evidence, peer review, and replicable results. Speculation must be based on existing scientific knowledge and must be testable and falsifiable. It should also be clearly labeled as speculation and not presented as fact. Collaboration with other scientists and open-mindedness are encouraged, but claims must be supported by data and evidence. Responsible and ethical communication of speculation is crucial in maintaining the credibility and integrity of the scientific community.
  • #1
Sithikor
My name is Jeff and I am not a paid scientist but rather an amateur. I enjoy Astronomy and learning about Particle Physics. I am also into Mythology, Theology and other spiritual based studies that are scientific in nature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF! Make sure you read our guidelines on speculation. We are a mainstream science community. "Mythology, Theology and other spiritual based studies" are certainly not scientific in nature.
 

Similar threads

What are the benefits of joining a community of science enthusiasts?
Replies
2
Views
267
Newbie Introduction
Replies
4
Views
362
What is the Impact of Community Engagement on Science Education?
Replies
1
Views
211
What can a physics undergrad bring to the scientific community?
Replies
1
Views
178
I think I might be bad at physics. I desperately want to get better.
Replies
4
Views
370
Can Self-Study Propel a Deep Understanding of Physics?
Replies
1
Views
460
High school French student looking for a mentor
Replies
1
Views
413
What are the guidelines for speculation and personal theories on Physics Forums?
Replies
1
Views
359
What is the Potential of a Science Community Forum?
Replies
1
Views
299
What is the Importance of Embracing Diversity in Scientific Communities?
Replies
1
Views
246

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top