What chapters can I skip when self-studying Griffiths electrodynamics?

In summary: No. It is not a requirement to use Griffiths in this course.In summary, the author is studying electrodynamics on their own and wants to be done with it once and for all. There is no such thing as being done with a physics book once and for all, and what is important for the rest of physics depends on the goals of the student. Skipping certain topics may result in lost continuity in learning, so it is best to complete the entire book.
  • #36
caz said:
You might try Zwiebach for quantum. It has the advantage of the MIT opencourseware lectures.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/mastering-quantum-mechanics
I think he wants to shorten the number of pages to read. Zwiebach seems to go the other way.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
If you already covered all of the chapters in Purcell, then you will find a fair amount of overlap with Griffiths. If it were me and I wanted to skip a couple of chapters, I would skip the ones about fields in media since Purcell has reasonable coverage of those. On the other hand I would definitely not skip the chapters on waves, conservation theorems, radiation and special relativity. Purcell skips a lot of that material or treats it in a way I found more confusing.

And by “cover” i mean read the chapters and solved some number of problems in the book.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #38
Concerning relativity Purcell confused me more than it helped. I think Griffiths is a much better book anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes Ahmed1029, malawi_glenn and jasonRF
  • #39
Ahmed1029 said:
The question was just me making sure to be economical and not be spending time on things generally skipped in college, because I only have 2 years left. So do I have to read an entire book for each remaining subject?
<<Emphasis added.>> This thread has forked into different paths. But I believe this is your underlying question.

It's been many moons since I was in school. But as far as I can remember, the professor typically did not go over the textbook from cover to cover. This even applied to several courses in which the professor wrote or co-wrote the textbook.

Often a textbook includes more material than can be covered in a one-semester course, or even a two-semester sequence. Often a textbook includes material that is not relevant to a department's particular curriculum (which may change over time), or contains material that is covered in a different course using a different textbook (which may change over time). On the flip side, often the professor supplements the primary textbook with portions from other textbooks, or from his own notes.

So my advice to you is what I wrote previously: There are many university websites describing details of their courses. Check those out as guides for your self-study. They likely won't all agree in their entirety. But there will be topics with high overlap.
 
  • Like
Likes jtbell and Ahmed1029
  • #41
malawi_glenn said:
I already referenced that above in my Reply #10. But I would encourage the OP to take a sampling of other universities. In the context of online resources, there are frequent references to MIT because of their extensive OpenCourseWare and because, well, it's MIT. But important caveat: Their course presentation in many instances is atypical, which isn't surprising since it's not a typical university.
 
  • Like
Likes Ahmed1029 and malawi_glenn
  • #42
CrysPhys said:
But as far as I can remember, the professor typically did not go over the textbook from cover to cover. This even applied to several courses in which the professor wrote or co-wrote the textbook.
Example: I use different parts of my book as the main reference in three different courses.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, berkeman, Ahmed1029 and 1 other person
  • #43
Ahmed1029 said:
I think Griffiths electrodynamics is fantastic and not all that sloppy. His QM book is on the other hand REALLY BAD, but I find no alternative at my level so I'm kinda stuck with it🥲.
You can try Quantum Theory by David Bohm
 
  • Like
Likes Ahmed1029 and vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top