- #1
- 4,309
- 49
Hi.
I'm not so well-versed in the topic of partial differential equations, but the following question has arisen.
Suppose that for some unknown function u(s, t) of two variables, we have a set of differential equations
[tex]\left\{ \begin{matrix} u_s(s, t) & {} = f(s, t, u(s, t)) \\ u_t(s, t) & {} = g(s, t, u(s, t)) \end{matrix} \right. [/tex]
where us denotes the partial derivative of u(s, t) w.r.t. s.
My question is, what the conditions on f would have to be in order to have a good solution for u(s, t). For example, we can integrate the first one to get u(s, T) for fixed t = T, and similarly the second one will give u(S, t) for fixed s = S, but of course u(S, T) must be well-defined (i.e. single-valued).
I am particularly interested in the case where f and g do not depend on s and t explicitly (i.e. only through u(s, t)) and the case where they do not depend on u(s, t) explicitly.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I'm not so well-versed in the topic of partial differential equations, but the following question has arisen.
Suppose that for some unknown function u(s, t) of two variables, we have a set of differential equations
[tex]\left\{ \begin{matrix} u_s(s, t) & {} = f(s, t, u(s, t)) \\ u_t(s, t) & {} = g(s, t, u(s, t)) \end{matrix} \right. [/tex]
where us denotes the partial derivative of u(s, t) w.r.t. s.
My question is, what the conditions on f would have to be in order to have a good solution for u(s, t). For example, we can integrate the first one to get u(s, T) for fixed t = T, and similarly the second one will give u(S, t) for fixed s = S, but of course u(S, T) must be well-defined (i.e. single-valued).
I am particularly interested in the case where f and g do not depend on s and t explicitly (i.e. only through u(s, t)) and the case where they do not depend on u(s, t) explicitly.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.