- #36
jim hardy
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 9,832
- 4,895
Ken Leong said:Yes, Dave. All four terminations are shorted.
To Dave's question
Ahhhhh, terminology... One man's short is another man's leakage...
I always use a an analog meter for such tests. That's because on the RX1 ohms range it applies tens of milliamps to the device under test.
Wetness gives a part-scale reading determined by the electrochemistry at the fault.
A hard short circuit that we'd expect to see on those Xrays will read very near zero
A digital meter on a high ohms scale will report a low number for a few hundred ohms of something conductive like carbonized insulation.
I'll bet Dave was thinking the same thing.
Individual tin whiskers will usually get burnt away by the current from an analog multimeter on low ohms scale.
I have seen however a "tin beard" , thousands of whiskers in a clump, growing between two adjacent terminals on a barrier terminal block. It passed enough current to actuate a solenoid valve and trip the power plant .
Tin is not the only metal susceptible
http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/reference/tech_papers/2007-brusse-metal-whiskers.pdf
That's why i suggest somehow getting the top off one of the failed ones so you can see inside. A clean interior says "well, it wasn't that."
old jim