- #36
WhoWee
- 219
- 0
After Nixon opened China the world seemed to quickly accept that human rights were a valid concern. Accordingly, many US companies have taken care to protect their public image and avoid damage to their brands. IMO - the US has provided assistance in an effort to encourage China to improve conditions for workers on their own initiative.
However, given that we owe China about $1.5Trillion would the TEA Party be considered radical or extreme if they spoke out against continuing to provide $47Million in annual aid to China?
However, given that we owe China about $1.5Trillion would the TEA Party be considered radical or extreme if they spoke out against continuing to provide $47Million in annual aid to China?