MHB What Determines the Degree and Coefficients of Polynomials?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the degree and coefficients of polynomials, specifically addressing the numbers 4 and 0. The number 4 is identified as a polynomial with a degree of 0 and a nonzero coefficient of 4. In contrast, the number 0 is also classified as a polynomial, but its degree is considered undefined due to the absence of nonzero terms. The conversation emphasizes that a polynomial must consist of constants and variables with non-negative integer exponents, and highlights the distinction between dividing by a constant versus a variable. Overall, both 4 and 0 qualify as polynomials under these definitions.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Specify the degree and the (nonzero) coefficients of each polynomial.

(A) 4

(B) 0

Solution:

The number 4 can be expressed as 4x^0. Is this correct?
If this is right, then the nonzero coefficient must be 4 itself. Is this right? The degree is 0.

The whole number 0 can be expressed as 0x^0. The degree is 0. What is the nonzero coefficient of 0?

Why is 4 a polynomial?

Why is 0 a polynomial?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(A) The degree of a constant is always 0. Any constant c can be written as cx^0.
(B) The degree of 0 is technically undefined. This is a polynomial but has no nonzero terms (obviously) and therefore has no degree.

These are certainly polynomials! More specifically, monomials, meaning they only have one term. A polynomial is a collection of constants and variables with exponents, but you cannot divide by a variable. Both 4 and 0 are then polynomials, because they do not break this rule.
 
joypav said:
(A) The degree of a constant is always 0. Any constant c can be written as cx^0.
(B) The degree of 0 is technically undefined. This is a polynomial but has no nonzero terms (obviously) and therefore has no degree.

These are certainly polynomials! More specifically, monomials, meaning they only have one term. A polynomial is a collection of constants and variables with exponents, but you cannot divide by a variable. Both 4 and 0 are then polynomials, because they do not break this rule.

You said that we cannot divide a variable. Say, for example, x. Is x/2 not considered x divided by 2?
 
RTCNTC said:
You said that we cannot divide a variable. Say, for example, x. Is x/2 not considered x divided by 2?

Not quite, if I understand what you're asking.

x/2 would be a polynomial. In this case, x is in the numerator. You CAN divide a variable by a constant. That is not an issue.

What I meant was, you CANNOT divide by a variable. Meaning, 2/x would not be a monomial. In this case, you have a variable in the denominator.
 
joypav said:
Not quite, if I understand what you're asking.

x/2 would be a polynomial. In this case, x is in the numerator. You CAN divide a variable by a constant. That is not an issue.

What I meant was, you CANNOT divide by a variable. Meaning, 2/x would not be a monomial. In this case, you have a variable in the denominator.

I get it now.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top