What Determines the Minimal Value in the Quadratic Form Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nhrock3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
nhrock3
403
0
3)
q:R^{3}->R is defined by q(x,y,z)=4(xy+yz+zx)
find the minimal M\in R so q(x,y,z)\leq M(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})
?
why in the solution the calculate the caracteristic polinomial
?
why if (t+2) is in power 2 then we have -2 in two members of
the formula q(v) ??
our polinomial doesn't separated into different lenear member
so in order to find its jordan form we need to find the minimal polinomial
etc..
but in the solution they said it straight forward why??
why did they coose in the end to put eigen vaule iside?
why its minimal?
we could put a vector which not is 0.5
?
is it true that the as the eigen vectors would diagonolise A
so is their orthonormal basis whould show Q as in sum of squares
correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You want your bilinear form B(x,y,z)\equiv M(x^2+y^2+z^2)-q(x,y,z) to be positive definite. This is equivalent to all eigenvalues being positive. Therefore you need the characteristic polynomial. So you actually need to compute
P(\lambda)=|B-\lambda id_3|
B is given by
\begin{pmatrix} M & -2 & -2\\ -2 & M & -2 \\ -2 & -2& M \end{pmatrix}
So, you compute the characteristic polynomial of
\begin{pmatrix} M-\lambda & -2 & -2\\ -2 & M-\lambda & -2 \\ -2 & -2& M-\lambda \end{pmatrix}
Now, let's call t\equiv M-\lambda
Then you get the characteristic polynomial
(t-4)(t+2)^2
which has solutions t=4,t=-2, which means
\lambda=M-4, \lambda=M+2
Now, you go figure out for which M all eigenvalues are positive ;)
 
nhrock,
The image in your first post (at http://i42.tinypic.com/2a8hlpg.png) was way too large, and had a huge amount of whitespace at the bottom. Please edit the image using Paint or another image editing tool so that it is no larger than about 1200 x 800 pixels.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top