What Determines the Motion of a Hockey Puck on a Frictionless Surface?

  • Thread starter Demmy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Motion
In summary, Jakeus314 attempted to solve for (b) but got stuck. He converted an acceleration into a velocity and got the wrong answer.
  • #1
Demmy
12
0
Please help -- Motion of a hockey puck

Homework Statement


Hi guys, can you please help me answer this problem?


A hockey puck with mass 0.160 kg is at rest at the origin on the horizontal, frictionless surface of the rink. At time t=0 a player applies a force of 0.250 N to the puck, parallel to the x-axis; he continues to apply this force until t=2.00 s. (a) What are the position and speed of the puck at t=2.00 s? (b) If the same force is again applied at t=5.00 s, what are the position and speed of the puck at t=7.00s


I got the 1st one, but I couldn't get the second one.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


welcome to PF!

You need to show your work before we can help. So why not show us how you solved for (a) and where you got stuck for (b).
 
  • #3


Given: F=0.250 N
m=0.160 kg
F=ma

a=F/m

leads to:

a=0.250/0.160

i got a= 1.5625

then I used the formula a=(2s)/(t^2) to get the distance

then I got s=3.13 m
then, couldn't solve for b, please help
 
  • #4


Btw, here are the answers

a) 3.13m, 3.13m/s
b) 21.9m, 6.25m/s
 
  • #5


extend (a) to 5 secs what is dist and velocity then these become the initial conditions in your eqns.

so at 2 secs the force ends and the puck glides along at a constant velocity (assume no friction) for 3 secs (so you're now at 5 sec mark)

vfinal = vinitial + a * t where t =7 - 5

dfinal= dinitial + vinitial * t + 1/2 a * t
 
  • #6


ahm, sir, where would I get my vinitial?
 
  • #7


Demmy said:
ahm, sir, where would I get my vinitial?
Apply Newton's first law of motion.
 
  • #8
Should V initial at 5s be any different than V at 2s? Can you find V at 2s?
 
  • #9


sir, I got the final velocity

I converted a= 1.563 m/(s^2) to m/s

so I got v= 3.13 m/s

then I used it as my vinitial to get my vfinal using the equation you gave me, my vfinal= 6.256 m/s

but when I tried to substitute that to the 2nd equation you gave me, I didn't got the correct answer.
 
  • #10


@Jakeus314: I don't think they are different sir, ahm, already got the answers for 2s sir
 
  • #11


I have another question, I got letter a) but why is the unit I got is m/(s^2) the answer should be m/s, but I got the right answer. so I just randomly thought about converting the acceleration to velocity, because the unit of acceleration is m/(s^2) and the velocity is m/s, but if I do that in a) the unit would be correct but the answer would be wrong.
 
  • #12
Demmy said:
sir, I got the final velocity

I converted a= 1.563 m/(s^2) to m/s

so I got v= 3.13 m/s

then I used it as my vinitial to get my vfinal using the equation you gave me, my vfinal= 6.256 m/s

but when I tried to substitute that to the 2nd equation you gave me, I didn't got the correct answer.

try not to say you converted an acceleration into a velocity... You may find a velocity using an acceleration etc.

V = V0 + a*t
V from pt A is good for V0 for pt B why?
 
  • #13
Demmy said:
@Jakeus314: I don't think they are different sir, ahm, already got the answers for 2s sir

Good.. Because no force is acting on the puck from 2s to 5s.
 
  • #14
The position in pt B comes from three distances traveled while moving. Pt A distance contributes some, then some more while moving at a constant speed, then more while accelerating again. Find the position for pt B from those pieces and you'll do fine.
 
  • #15


ahm sir, sorry bout the convertion thingy, I don't get is sir.
 
  • #16


I tried to find the distance for 5s, so I used the same accelerationso my equation is (1.563*(5^2))/2

then I got 19.5375
 
  • #17
Demmy said:
ahm sir, sorry bout the convertion thingy, I don't get is sir.

Maybe I'm just being picky. When people say it that way I start thinking they're missing some algebra/units/equation concepts.

Is English not your first language?
 
  • #18
Demmy said:
I tried to find the distance for 5s, so I used the same accelerationso my equation is (1.563*(5^2))/2

then I got 19.5375

5^2 is an error here. Has the puck been accelerating for 5 seconds?
 
  • #19
Check my post 14 again. Do pt B by adding three things. Pt A answer, d=r*t during the 3 seconds of no acceleration, and last add the distance traveled while accelerating for 2 seconds with a starting velocity of ptA velocity.
 
  • #20
Demmy said:
I have another question, I got letter a) but why is the unit I got is m/(s^2) the answer should be m/s, but I got the right answer. so I just randomly thought about converting the acceleration to velocity, because the unit of acceleration is m/(s^2) and the velocity is m/s, but if I do that in a) the unit would be correct but the answer would be wrong.

I can't say for sure why you got acceleration units.

Do unit analysis to see what it should be, given the values you added or multiplied.
 
  • #21


no sir, english is my third language
 
  • #22


it didn't say that the the puck has stop moving, it just said that same force is applied at t=5s
 
  • #23


you have three states in this problem

1) at t0 for 2 secs puck accelerates to velocity v2 and travels dist d2

2) at t2 to t5 puck glides at constant velocity (ie v2) distance d5 = d2 + v2 * (3 secs)

3) at t5 puck accelerates to velocity v7 = v2 * a * (2 secs) and dist d7 = d5 + v2 * (2 secs) + 1/2 a * (2 secs)
 
  • #24


sir, I tried all of your equation I didn't got the correct answer.

and I have a question in number 2 in the equation "d5 = d2 + v2 * (3 secs)" isn't that suppose to be "a" or acceleration instead of "v" velocity? because I checked it.
 
  • #25
Demmy said:
it didn't say that the the puck has stop moving, it just said that same force is applied at t=5s

Correct. The puck does not stop moving.
 
  • #26
Demmy said:
sir, I tried all of your equation I didn't got the correct answer.

and I have a question in number 2 in the equation "d5 = d2 + v2 * (3 secs)" isn't that suppose to be "a" or acceleration instead of "v" velocity? because I checked it.

Their equation in #2 looks good. Using d=v*t for second piece.
 
  • #27


jedishrfu said:
you have three states in this problem

1) at t0 for 2 secs puck accelerates to velocity v2 and travels dist d2

2) at t2 to t5 puck glides at constant velocity (ie v2) distance d5 = d2 + v2 * (3 secs)

3) at t5 puck accelerates to velocity v7 = v2 * a * (2 secs) and dist d7 = d5 + v2 * (2 secs) + 1/2 a * (2 secs)

slight correction on the last eqn meant to say for the last term 1/2 a *t^2 with t=2 secs
 

FAQ: What Determines the Motion of a Hockey Puck on a Frictionless Surface?

What is the motion of a hockey puck?

The motion of a hockey puck is the way it moves through space. It can be described using principles of physics such as velocity, acceleration, and momentum.

What factors affect the motion of a hockey puck?

The motion of a hockey puck can be affected by factors such as the force applied to it from a stick, the friction between the puck and the ice, and air resistance.

How is the motion of a hockey puck calculated?

The motion of a hockey puck can be calculated using equations from Newton's laws of motion. These equations take into account the forces acting on the puck and can determine its velocity and position at any given time.

What is the difference between linear and angular motion of a hockey puck?

Linear motion of a hockey puck refers to its movement in a straight line, while angular motion refers to its rotational movement. A hockey puck can experience both types of motion simultaneously, such as when it is sliding and spinning on the ice.

How does the motion of a hockey puck affect gameplay?

The motion of a hockey puck is crucial in gameplay as it determines the speed and direction of the puck, which can greatly impact the outcome of a game. Understanding and predicting the motion of the puck can give players an advantage in their strategy and gameplay.

Back
Top