Undergrad What does E(nergy) = m(ass) (times c^2) mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sayetsu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary
Inertia mass (m) is distinct from matter and relates to energy (E) through the principle of mass-energy equivalence, where matter can be converted into energy, as seen in nuclear reactions. When a body with rest mass m is transformed into energy, it can release energy in forms like gamma radiation. Conversely, energy can also contribute to the mass of a system in its rest frame. Finding quality explanations online can be challenging, but there are numerous resources available that cater to different learning styles. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of physics and their applications in nuclear technology.
sayetsu
Messages
46
Reaction score
3
I know m isn't matter; it's inertial mass, but I don't know what that means or how it "equals" energy. I've never found an explanation I understood, so I thought I'd try asking here. Matter can be converted to energy, though, right? That's how nuclear bombs work, or hydrogen bombs...my recollection's a little fuzzy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you not find a good explanation on line?
 
It means that a body of rest mass ##m## releases energy ##E## if converted to some form without rest mass (e.g. gamma radiation). Or alternatively that energy ##E## contributes ##m## to the mass of some system in its rest frame.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and berkeman
Hi Sayetsu

There are literally hundreds of videos you can find; the challenge is finding the "good" ones - which will differ for most people depending on background etc

Based on your question I would try these two (in this order)
Special Relativity (E = mc2) Explained A Four minute reminder of what you asked

Why E=mc² is wrong An extra 6 minutes that either reminds you / tells you that there's a bit more to the formula that doesn't often get discussed.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
947
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
14K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K