What does it mean that symmetries do not hold globally?

In summary: It is possible, though, for curvature to prevent a global symmetry, as with the symmetries of the FLRW metric being broken by the presence of mass/energy in the universe.In summary, Lorentz symmetry and time translational symmetry are not global in an expanding universe. This means that other Hubble spheres outside our observable universe could have different symmetries. However, the assumption in our models is that the entire universe looks the same as our observable universe, including the presence or absence of symmetries. Local Lorentz symmetry still holds, but curvature can break global symmetry.
  • #1
Suekdccia
351
27
TL;DR Summary
If symmetries in the universe do not hold globally, what does that mean?
Perhaps this is a stupid question but, if Lorentz symmetry and time translational symmetry are not global in an expanding universe, wouldn't that mean that is possible that other Hubble spheres outside our observable universe could have other symmetries or an absence of the Lorentz symmetry? I mean, does this mean that the Lorentz symmetry could hold in our local region of spacetime (that is, our observable universe) but, as it does not hold globally, there could be other regions where it would not hold?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Suekdccia said:
if Lorentz symmetry and time translational symmetry are not global in an expanding universe
Lorentz symmetry isn't global in any curved spacetime.

Time translation symmetry doesn't even exist at all except in stationary spacetimes (spacetimes with a timelike Killing vector field).

Suekdccia said:
wouldn't that mean that is possible that other Hubble spheres outside our observable universe could have other symmetries
The assumption in our models is that the entire universe looks the same as our observable universe. That would include the presence or absence of symmetries.

Of course we have no way of testing that assumption, but it's the simplest one, and without ay evidence against it there's no point in making things more complicated than they need to be.

Suekdccia said:
or an absence of the Lorentz symmetry?
Not locally; any spacetime that GR can model has local Lorentz symmetry.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

FAQ: What does it mean that symmetries do not hold globally?

What does it mean that symmetries do not hold globally?

When we say that symmetries do not hold globally, it means that the symmetrical properties of a system or a space are not consistent throughout the entire system or space. Symmetries might be present in localized regions but break down or change when considering the system as a whole.

Can you give an example of a global symmetry breaking?

One example of global symmetry breaking is in cosmology, where the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales (appearing the same in every direction), but locally, structures like galaxies, stars, and planets break this symmetry, creating a more complex and varied local environment.

How is global symmetry breaking significant in physics?

Global symmetry breaking is significant because it can lead to the formation of complex structures and patterns in physical systems. It is a key concept in understanding phenomena such as phase transitions, the formation of topological defects, and the behavior of fundamental forces in particle physics.

What role does global symmetry breaking play in the Standard Model of particle physics?

In the Standard Model of particle physics, global symmetry breaking is crucial for explaining the masses of elementary particles. The Higgs mechanism, for example, involves the breaking of electroweak symmetry, which gives mass to the W and Z bosons while leaving the photon massless.

Are there mathematical tools to study systems where symmetries do not hold globally?

Yes, there are several mathematical tools and frameworks to study such systems. Group theory, differential geometry, and topological methods are commonly used to analyze and understand the implications of global symmetry breaking in various physical contexts.

Back
Top