What does this derivative notation mean in Goldstein's Classical Mech?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The notation $$F_s=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}$$ represents the force component in the direction of the path, defined as the negative directional derivative of the potential V in that direction. It connects the potential function V with the force vector through the unit velocity vector ##\hat{v}##. The directional derivative of V at a point ##\vec{r}## in the direction of ##\hat{v}## is expressed as $$V'(\vec{r};\hat{v})=\nabla V(\vec{r})\cdot\hat{v}$$, which equates to the negative of the force component. This relationship highlights how forces can be derived from the potential energy landscape. Understanding this notation is crucial for analyzing dynamics in classical mechanics.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
In the book "Classical Mechanics" by Goldstein, there is the following snippet

By a well-known theorem of vector analysis, a necessary and sufficient condition that the work ##W_{12}##, be independent of the physical path taken by the particle is that ##\vec{F}## be the gradient of some scalar function of position

$$\vec{F}=-\nabla V(\vec{r})\tag{1.16}$$

where ##V## is called the potential, or potential energy. The existence of ##V## can be inferred intuitively by a simply argument. If ##W_{12}## is independent of the path of integration between the end points 1 and 2, it should be possible to express ##W_{12}## as the change in a quantity that depends only upon the positions of the endpoints. The quantity may be designated ##-V##, so that for a differential path length we have the relation
Relevant Equations
$$\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{s}=-dV$$

or

$$F_s=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}$$

which is equivalent to 1.16.
My question is simply about the notation used here.

What does

$$F_s=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}$$

mean exactly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force component in the direction of the path = minus directional derivative of potential in the path direction.
 
Ok, then this is how I have understood it using notation I am more familiar with.

We have a function ##V(\vec{r})##.

Let ##\hat{v}## denote the unit velocity vector at ##\vec{r}##.

Then, the directional derivative of ##V## at ##\vec{r}## in the direction of ##\hat{v}## is

$$V'(\vec{r};\hat{v})=\nabla V(\vec{r})\cdot\hat{v}=-\vec{F}\cdot \hat{v}=-F_s$$

$$F_s=-V'(\vec{r};\hat{v})=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial s}$$
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top