- #36
billschnieder
- 808
- 10
Hi ThomasT,ThomasT said:The inequality is based on three simultaneously existing values. The experiment can only generate two values at a time.
You are right. Clearly, the experiment in the OP violates the inequality in the OP therefore either one of the assumptions required to obtain the inequality or one of the assumptions used to generate terms from the experiment is wrong.
The experimenters mistakenly thought that expectation values obtained from just pairs of coins would be valid terms. However a simple inspection reveals thatI take this to be your vital assumption. That is, this is the assumption that is contradicted via the violation of the inequality by the coin-toss test.
a*b=-1, a*c=-1, b*c=-1
can only occur if the individual outcomes change with time. Let us start with a=-1, b=1 we get ab=-1, in order to get ac = -1 it means "c" must be +1 but b is already +1 so bc can not be -1 at the same time. The scenario is impossible if we have all three outcomes at the same time. However if each coin is dynamic with the values changing, it is possible to obtain the scenario, just as in the OP experiment. Therefore, in this case, the cause of the violation is the assumption that pairs taken at different times from a dynamic system are appropriate substitutes for the LHS of the inequality. Note that if we include the bias of the unmeasured coin from the OP for each toss into a list of triples of outcomes such as:
a b c
+ - -
- + +
...
etc
and the from this list we calculate <ab>, <ac>, <bc>, the inequality will not be violated. It is now obvious why the so-called "DrC challenge" misses the point completely.
Yes, this is the argument made by De Raedt and Sica in the articles cited above.I also take it that this is what you consider to be the effective cause of BI violation in Bell tests. Which would mean that what Bell stated as being the vital assumption was not the vital assumption, and the locality (or independence) condition encoded in Bell's formulation is precluded from being the effective cause of BI violation.
Last edited: