- #36
Townsend
- 232
- 0
outsider said:so it does have to do with perception. When a white guy drives down the street in a luxury vehicle, no one thinks anything of it... but when a black guy drives down the street in a nice car, there comes a certain set of thoughts... I am guilty too... and it all has to do with what we choose to see. I think you guys chose to see this video in a certain light and put your personal spin on it... subtle, but unfair. Again, you say that it is a judgement call... and so townsends judgement was pretty clear and disallowed for another persons perception...
What? What the heck are you trying to say here? That guy was not being prudent and that was pretty clear that he didn't understand that fund raisers are not the place for people to go off on politics. Are you telling me that I would have reacted differently if he was white?
c'mon, if i didn't see it on the news myself, i might even think of it as a comedy act... hell, at 8:10am on 9/11, I saw what looked like a movie on CNN... i was in disbelief myself...
Are you saying that if someone attacks me I should be caring about correcting them and try my best not to offend them when explaining to them that they were wrong?
i disagree... especially in this case, it is obvious that he was making fun of someone... who was it that he was making fun of? And for what reason?
Someone who didn't get it. So what?
yeah, maybe I'm a weirdo because I'm not compromised. You are defending a loser for whatever reason you chose to... and you're so weak that you throw in a jk... whatever you say because the jokes on you...
I'm a loser now? Wow... I need to cool off... I just hope that the moderators leave your words up.
You'd rather fit in than to believe the weirdo who built an ark to save the earth. IMO, Sucks to be you dude. it really does...
Just so you know, I am agnostic. But you can believe whatever you want.
back to the thread... apparently, what kanye west said was not in the script... which probably lead mike myers to the look on his face. kanye west is known to say whatever is on his mind no matter how contraversial it may be. i don't think it was wise of him to say that...
Here you are calling me a loser for saying he doesn't get it and then you move on to say that you don't think it was wise of him to say that...
What is the difference between what you said and what I said?
Pengwuino, here's some advice... just stick to defending yourself... defending others may only compromise your own credibility.
I don't think your really in much a position to be giving out advice considering this post.
[edit]
******************************************************************************
To keep score so far Outsider has said he thinks it was not wise for Mr. West to say what he said. Which for all practical purposes is exactly what why I titled this thread, "Some people just don't get it..."
So far I am accused of
1. attacking someone beliefs. Outsider seems to think the purpose the title of this thread is to attack someone’s beliefs.
2. I am told that I should respond nicely to people who attack me. (the irony)
3. I am called a coward
4. I am called a loser.
5. At the request of outsider I am adding that I am kniving individual
Outsider is directing all of this vehement anger at me because he thinks the reason for the title of the thread is that I wanted to attack someone’s beliefs. I have attempted to explain why I worded things the way I did and have so far restrained myself from making any personal attacks on anyone.
Maybe it's time this thread gets moved to the politics section. Or maybe one of the moderators can change the thread title. Maybe people would stop jumping on me if it said:
"Poorly timed political pop shot"
Or no... I am sure someone would still take offense...
How about:
"Fund raiser funny"
No...someone would still think I am trying to make a political statement...
I dunno. I have no idea how I could have titled this thread so that people would realize that it's purpose is to make fun of someone for not knowing when it is and is not prudent to be political and not to attack Mr. West's personal views on Bush.
In any case, this kind of response is not called for.
[/edit]
Last edited: