What happens to the uncertainty principle if....

In summary, the conversation discusses the Feynman Lectures on the electron gun experiment, which demonstrates the interference pattern of electrons when they are not observed, but behave as bullets when observed. The question is raised about replacing the holes with detectors that can retrieve all information about the electron and shoot a new one with the same properties. It is concluded that this is not possible due to the uncertainty principle, and any attempt to do so would result in two independent sources of electrons with no interference. The concept of quantum cloning is also discussed, but it is determined that it would not work in this scenario due to the size constraints of the machine. The conversation ends with the understanding that in theory, it is possible to transfer the state of the original electron
  • #1
borib
4
1
TL;DR Summary
What happens to the uncertainty principle if we could build this experiment
I just read the Feynman Lectures about the electron gun experiment with two holes in the middle wall.

It demonstrates that if we don't look at the electrons while they travel toward the detector there is an interference pattern in the probability curve of the electrons similarly to what happens with waves. But if we try to measure which hole the electron passes through the probability pattern changes and the electrons behave like bullets.

At the end of the lecture there is a further experiment this time with a wall with rollers --> here <--
I don't understand much the details of the latter experiment but it turns out that even in this situation is not possible to break the uncertainty principle.

My question is what would happen in the following situation:

We have the middle wall but this time the two holes are replaced with two detectors that perform the following actions:

- retrieve all the information about the electron speed, angle/direction, spin, hole A or B, etc...
- block the electron
- shoot another electron or the same electron with the same speed, angle/direction, spin etc... that has been retrieved before it was stopped.

This way the new electron has the same properties that would have had the original electron if it was not watched by the machines and it goes on toward the backstop with the movable detector described in the lecture.

What is the probability curve of such situation? Will it have interference or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
borib said:
- retrieve all the information about the electron speed, angle/direction, spin, hole A or B, etc...
This can only be done within the constraints of the uncertainty principle.

borib said:
This way the new electron has the same properties that would have had the original electron if it was not watched by the machines and it goes on toward the backstop with the movable detector described in the lecture.
That's not possible, since you have performed a measurement on the electron.

borib said:
What is the probability curve of such situation? Will it have interference or not?
You will end up with two independent sources of electrons, so no interference.
 
  • Like
Likes borib
  • #3
  • #4
borib said:
@DrClaude Thanks for the explanation. I've also been told that quantum cloning is not allowed.
But we can perform imperfect cloning instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cloning ?
You don't need cloning if you do not care about the initial electron. You could transfer its state to a new electron, which would be indistinguishable from the original. But to do this, you would need access to the full state of the original electron, which would require here an apparatus at least as big as the two slots, so you would lose any which-way information.
 
  • #5
DrClaude said:
But to do this, you would need access to the full state of the original electron, which would require here an apparatus at least as big as the two slots, so you would lose any which-way information.

Just to understand, are you saying that in theory is possible but is just a problem of the dimensions of such machine?
 
  • #6
borib said:
Just to understand, are you saying that in theory is possible but is just a problem of the dimensions of such machine?
I am saying that the theory requires the machine to be at least as wide as the two slits to be able to perform what you want.

Anything smaller will correspond to a measurement of position (which slit information), so there can be no interference.
 
  • Like
Likes borib

FAQ: What happens to the uncertainty principle if....

What happens to the uncertainty principle if the position and momentum are measured simultaneously?

According to the uncertainty principle, it is impossible to measure the exact position and momentum of a particle at the same time. This means that the more accurately we measure one quantity, the less accurately we can measure the other. Therefore, if the position and momentum are measured simultaneously, the uncertainty in both quantities will increase.

How does the uncertainty principle apply to macroscopic objects?

The uncertainty principle applies to all objects, regardless of their size. However, its effects are not noticeable in macroscopic objects because their uncertainties are incredibly small compared to their size. For example, the uncertainty in the position of a car is so small that it is practically zero compared to its size.

Does the uncertainty principle only apply to particles?

The uncertainty principle applies to all physical quantities, including position, momentum, energy, and time. It is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics that applies to all objects, whether they are particles or macroscopic objects.

Can the uncertainty principle be violated?

No, the uncertainty principle is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics and has been extensively tested and verified through experiments. It cannot be violated, and any attempt to do so would contradict our current understanding of the behavior of particles at the quantum level.

How does the uncertainty principle affect our everyday lives?

The uncertainty principle has a negligible effect on our everyday lives. Its effects are only noticeable at the microscopic level, and at the macroscopic level, the uncertainties are too small to be observed. However, the uncertainty principle is crucial in understanding the behavior of particles and plays a significant role in technologies such as transistors and lasers.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
968
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top