- #1
Yazan975
- 30
- 0
But when you get to the step c + b > -ax > d + b you have to divide by -a anyway and the >s flip again. I think it's good in that you get that extra step (to stress the point of what happens when you divide by a negative) but greg1313's method is slightly more efficient.Wilmer said:-c < ax + b < -d
Easier to work with (after re-arranging):
c > -(ax + b) > d
Ya...agree...BUT li'l ole me prefers ? > ? > ? to ? < ? < ?topsquark said:But when you get to the step c + b > -ax > d + b you have to divide by -a anyway and the >s flip again. I think it's good in that you get that extra step (to stress the point of what happens when you divide by a negative) but greg1313's method is slightly more efficient.
-Dan
The possible range of values refers to the minimum and maximum values that a particular variable can take on. It is the entire spectrum of values that are theoretically possible for that variable.
Knowing the possible range of values is important for understanding the limitations and potential of a particular variable. It can also help in making predictions and setting realistic expectations.
The possible range of values can be determined through experimentation, statistical analysis, or theoretical calculations. It depends on the specific variable and the available data or information.
Yes, the possible range of values can change depending on various factors such as new discoveries, changes in technology, or shifts in the environment. It is important to regularly reassess the possible range of values for accurate and up-to-date information.
There may be limitations to the possible range of values, especially in situations where there is incomplete or insufficient data. It is also possible that the true range of values may be outside of the currently known or calculated range. Therefore, the possible range of values should always be viewed as a rough estimate rather than an absolute truth.