What If Bush Admin Institutes Martial Law?

  • News
  • Thread starter TheStatutoryApe
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Law
In summary, the conversation discusses the hypothetical scenario of the Bush administration instituting Martial Law and canceling or delaying elections. The possibilities of terrorist attacks or other threats being used as justification for such actions are also mentioned. It is noted that if this were to happen, Congress would have the power to impeach the President and the new President would still take office as usual. The role of the Secret Service and the US military in this situation is also discussed. Some joking comments are made about the involvement of private military companies and marching bullfrogs.
  • #1
TheStatutoryApe
296
4
What If...

I'm sorry if this doesn't seem a very serious topic but I would prefer serious responses so I'm putting it here.

So what happens if, for what ever reason, the Bush admin institutes Martial Law and tries to cancel the elections? I understand that the elections are supposed to continue regardless but what if they try to stop them anyway? Maybe there have even been terrorist attacks and/or threats to voting stations and voters that would give them a rationale for suspending the elections, or at least delaying them.
Perhaps they don't even succeed in stopping the elections but Bush and his people simply dig their heels in and refuse to leave regardless. Would he simply be arrested? and just how likely do you think it is that they would find the people willing to arrest him and that there would be enough secret service willing to go along with his arrest? and what happens if there aren't?

I've heard people express worry that Bush may try such a thing and I really have no idea what sort of provisions there are for resolving such an issue. Especially if no one is willing to simply arrest him.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
TheStatutoryApe said:
I'm sorry if this doesn't seem a very serious topic but I would prefer serious responses so I'm putting it here.

So what happens if, for what ever reason, the Bush admin institutes Martial Law and tries to cancel the elections? I understand that the elections are supposed to continue regardless but what if they try to stop them anyway? Maybe there have even been terrorist attacks and/or threats to voting stations and voters that would give them a rationale for suspending the elections, or at least delaying them.
Perhaps they don't even succeed in stopping the elections but Bush and his people simply dig their heels in and refuse to leave regardless. Would he simply be arrested? and just how likely do you think it is that they would find the people willing to arrest him and that there would be enough secret service willing to go along with his arrest? and what happens if there aren't?

I've heard people express worry that Bush may try such a thing and I really have no idea what sort of provisions there are for resolving such an issue. Especially if no one is willing to simply arrest him.

If he canceled or delayed elections in a situation that didn't warrant it, then Congress would impeach him. If the situation were so dangerous and chaotic that Congress couldn't meet - well, that's what the emergency laws that so many are upset about are designed to cover. An appropriate situation to declare martial law would be pretty obvious to all.

If he refused to leave, it wouldn't change anything. The new President would be sworn in as usual and laws passed by Congress would be sent to the new President to approve or veto. It's the position that's important. The White House is just where the President lives.

If Bush refused to leave the White House, then I guess you'd go through the normal process every landlord wanting to evict a tenant has to go through. Hopefully the authorities would move the Bush family's possessions to a warehouse or something. It looks kind of tacky if they just sit them out on the curb (plus it would be hard to keep tourists from stealing them - possessions of a Presidential family would have quite a bit of collector value).
 
  • #3
Also, the secret service's responsibility is the the office of the Presidency, not the sitting President himself. All of the major candidates already have secret service protection, so it isn't like the secret service is Bush's personal army.

Bush has no actual control over the elections or the other branches of government. His control over the military and the SS is limited by the fact that they are citizens of the US. Military coups are not really part of our vocabulary and at some point in the chain of command, the officers would simply refuse to transmit his orders. He has no direct control over any officers who actually have direct control over troops. By and large, our military is true citizen soldiers: patriots. It is not comprised of mindless automotons nor power-mad fascists.

As Bob said, his physical location is irrelevant - he can barricade himself in his room with a few loyal secret service agents to guard the door, but that won't actually change anything.

Barring some extreme stroke of luck Bush would have to commit a Hitler-style terrorist attack on his own government (with deniability) to be able to stay in power past his term.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Also, the secret service's responsibility is the the office of the Presidency, not the sitting President himself. All of the major candidates already have secret service protection, so it isn't like the secret service is Bush's personal army.


Bush can hire "Blackwater USA" to be his personal army though
 
  • #5
mjsd said:
Bush can hire "Blackwater USA" to be his personal army though

A small private army has nothing on the US army. Since the new President would be the acting Commander in Chief, he and Congress could deploy the US Army and get help from, say, GBR. The US Congress can authorize it to avoid flying in the face of Posse Comitatus. So it could be a show-down of Blackwater versus Delta Force & SAS.

Who will be responsible for the snacks? :confused:
 
  • #6
The answer is obvious... marching bullfrogs with machine guns will oust Bush and install their leader until the crisis passes.

You did say "what if'...
 
  • #7
chemisttree said:
The answer is obvious... marching bullfrogs with machine guns will oust Bush and install their leader until the crisis passes.
I was just going to say that!
 
  • #8
rrribbitt!
 

FAQ: What If Bush Admin Institutes Martial Law?

1. What is martial law?

Martial law is a temporary government rule, usually declared during times of emergency or crisis, that allows the military to take control of civilian functions in a country.

2. Can the Bush administration legally institute martial law?

Under the Constitution, the power to declare martial law lies with Congress, not the executive branch. However, the president does have the authority to deploy the military for domestic purposes under the Insurrection Act.

3. What would be the implications of instituting martial law?

Instituting martial law would mean suspending certain civil liberties and putting the military in charge of enforcing laws and maintaining order. It could also lead to restrictions on movement, freedom of speech, and other rights.

4. How likely is it that the Bush administration would institute martial law?

There is no evidence to suggest that the Bush administration had any plans to institute martial law. In fact, the administration faced significant backlash for even considering the use of military tribunals for suspected terrorists.

5. What would be the potential consequences of martial law being implemented?

The consequences of martial law can vary greatly depending on the specific circumstances and how it is implemented. In general, it could lead to civil unrest, extensive military presence in civilian areas, and potential human rights violations.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
56
Views
10K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
70
Views
8K
Back
Top