- #1
- 19,557
- 10,337
Definition/Summary
Fermat's little theorem states that if [itex]p[/itex] is a prime number, then for any integer [itex]a[/itex], [itex]a^{p}-a[/itex] will be divisible by
Equations
[tex]a^{p-1}\equiv1\pmod p \quad (\text{for\ }a \not\equiv 0 \pmod p)[/tex]
[tex]a^p\equiv a\pmod p[/tex]
Extended explanation
Fermat's Little Theorem
If p is a prime number and a an integer, then
[tex]a^p\equiv a\ (p)[/tex]
In order to prove Fermat's Little theorem, we will start by proving a superficially slightly weaker result, which is also referred to as Fermat's Little Theorem, on occasion. The two results imply each other, however.
Theorem
Let a and p be coprime, then
[tex]a^{p-1}-1 \equiv 0\ (p).[/tex]
Proof
Start by listing the first p-1 positive multiples of a:
[tex]a, 2a, 3a, \ldots, (p -1)a[/tex]
Suppose that [itex]ra[/itex] and [itex]sa[/itex] are the same modulo [itex]p[/itex], with [itex]0 <r,s < p[/itex]. Since [itex]a[/itex] is nonzero mod [itex]p[/itex], we can cancel, giving [itex]r \equiv s\ (p)[/itex]. So the [itex]p-1[/itex] multiples of [itex]a[/itex] above are distinct and nonzero; that is, they must be congruent to [itex]1, 2, 3, \ldots, p-1[/itex] in some order. Multiply all these congruences together and we find
[tex]a2a3a\ldots (p-1)a \equiv 1.2.3\ldots(p-1)\ (p)[/tex]
or better,
[tex]a^{p-1}(p-1)! \equiv\ (p-1)! (mod p)[/tex].
Divide both side by (p-1)! to complete the proof.
Remark
This result can be proven by appeal to Lagrange's theorem, since the non-zero residues form a group modulo [itex]p[/itex]. Although we haven't proven, they are a group, we are explicitly using that multiplicative inverses modulo [itex]p[/itex] exist, which is an elementary application of Euclid's algorithm.
Corollary
Let [itex]p[/itex] be a prime and [itex]a[/itex] any integer, then [itex]a^p \equiv a\ (p)[/itex].
Proof
The result is trival (both sides are zero) if [itex]p[/itex] divides [itex]a[/itex]. If not then we need only multiply the congruence in Fermat's Little Theorem by [itex]a[/itex] to complete the proof.
* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
Fermat's little theorem states that if [itex]p[/itex] is a prime number, then for any integer [itex]a[/itex], [itex]a^{p}-a[/itex] will be divisible by
Equations
[tex]a^{p-1}\equiv1\pmod p \quad (\text{for\ }a \not\equiv 0 \pmod p)[/tex]
[tex]a^p\equiv a\pmod p[/tex]
Extended explanation
Fermat's Little Theorem
If p is a prime number and a an integer, then
[tex]a^p\equiv a\ (p)[/tex]
In order to prove Fermat's Little theorem, we will start by proving a superficially slightly weaker result, which is also referred to as Fermat's Little Theorem, on occasion. The two results imply each other, however.
Theorem
Let a and p be coprime, then
[tex]a^{p-1}-1 \equiv 0\ (p).[/tex]
Proof
Start by listing the first p-1 positive multiples of a:
[tex]a, 2a, 3a, \ldots, (p -1)a[/tex]
Suppose that [itex]ra[/itex] and [itex]sa[/itex] are the same modulo [itex]p[/itex], with [itex]0 <r,s < p[/itex]. Since [itex]a[/itex] is nonzero mod [itex]p[/itex], we can cancel, giving [itex]r \equiv s\ (p)[/itex]. So the [itex]p-1[/itex] multiples of [itex]a[/itex] above are distinct and nonzero; that is, they must be congruent to [itex]1, 2, 3, \ldots, p-1[/itex] in some order. Multiply all these congruences together and we find
[tex]a2a3a\ldots (p-1)a \equiv 1.2.3\ldots(p-1)\ (p)[/tex]
or better,
[tex]a^{p-1}(p-1)! \equiv\ (p-1)! (mod p)[/tex].
Divide both side by (p-1)! to complete the proof.
Remark
This result can be proven by appeal to Lagrange's theorem, since the non-zero residues form a group modulo [itex]p[/itex]. Although we haven't proven, they are a group, we are explicitly using that multiplicative inverses modulo [itex]p[/itex] exist, which is an elementary application of Euclid's algorithm.
Corollary
Let [itex]p[/itex] be a prime and [itex]a[/itex] any integer, then [itex]a^p \equiv a\ (p)[/itex].
Proof
The result is trival (both sides are zero) if [itex]p[/itex] divides [itex]a[/itex]. If not then we need only multiply the congruence in Fermat's Little Theorem by [itex]a[/itex] to complete the proof.
* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!