- #1
- 8,142
- 1,760
St. Paul (AP) There's an unknown object hovering in the sky over the Twin Cities, and it doesn't appear to be a bird or a plane. [continued]
http://wcco.com/localnews/local_story_232202348.html
Last edited by a moderator:
St. Paul (AP) There's an unknown object hovering in the sky over the Twin Cities, and it doesn't appear to be a bird or a plane. [continued]
Some witnesses suggested the object was a research balloon; however, the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Weather Service could not determine what the object was.
CASE #1: TWIN CITIES, MN, August 19, 2004
The first incident involved one, or possibly two, unidentified white objects, which were seen by many witnesses over the Twin Cities, MN, area on the afternoon of Thursday, August 19. At first, we assumed that the object(s) might be high-altitude, helium-filled balloons, carrying scientific instruments, since measurement by witnesses suggested they were at, or above, an altitude of 50,000 feet. [continued]
Ivan Seeking said:You know, Bush was there yesterday. That made me wonder if this could be related to security.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Here's a head-turner for a security-nervous city: A large white object was spotted in the skies above the nation's capital in the pre-dawn hours Wednesday. [continued]
The object is currently unidentified and there is no clear explanation for its presence. It could be a natural phenomenon, a man-made object, or a hoax.
The duration of the object's presence is unknown as it has not been consistently observed. Some reports claim that it has been seen for a few minutes, while others say it has been present for several hours.
There have been several videos and photos circulating online claiming to show the object in the St. Paul sky. However, the authenticity of these recordings is still being investigated and no confirmed footage has been released.
At this point, there is no evidence to suggest that the object is of extraterrestrial origin. It is important to approach this phenomenon with scientific skepticism and not jump to conclusions without sufficient evidence.
As a scientist, I cannot provide a definitive explanation without more information and data. It is possible that the object could be a rare natural occurrence or a man-made object such as a drone or weather balloon. Further investigation and analysis are needed to determine the true nature of the object.